Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
I'm not sure. 10.x is 2 years old already and I don't even have support for
that board in FW. You may have to tweak the project.
…On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 7:19 AM Robin Szemeti ***@***.***> wrote:
Can I assume that the 11.x.x 422 binaries are going to work on this
without much issue?
I'm just about to pop it in the oven to bake ... I noticed the 470uH
inductor in the 10.1 BOM is listed as 0603 when its really 1206 on the
board ... and the i2C EEPROM is missing from the BOM, but I had one in
stock, so its ready to cook!
I just need to remember how to load the bootloader now ...
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#125>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAL6J3I6BO6SV3E4PCGZR5DWZIPJDANCNFSM6AAAAAAVH5FEZQ>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
I have components for 4 more boards ... I may end up ordering some 11.x boards to add to my every growing collection of "boards I didn't assemble" :) My first ones were the "stacked" boards, then the "single board" version, then the 10.0.1 ... it looks like the BOM is very similar so only a few extra bits to buy ... and this project has done wonders for my stock of surface mount inductors, I'll never run out! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Can I assume that the 11.x.x 422 binaries are going to work on this without much issue?
I'm just about to pop it in the oven to bake ... I noticed the 470uH inductor in the 10.1 BOM is listed as 0603 when its really 1206 on the board ... and the i2C EEPROM is missing from the BOM, but I had one in stock, so its ready to cook!
I just need to remember how to load the bootloader now ...
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions