Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automatically annotate figures with pathway strengths #5

Open
petercombs opened this issue Mar 11, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Automatically annotate figures with pathway strengths #5

petercombs opened this issue Mar 11, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@petercombs
Copy link
Owner

One nice thing to do would be to automatically take a figure like this one from the Schaap review:

Screen Shot 2019-03-11 at 12 35 33 PM

and annotate it by coloring genes by strength of hit.

@petercombs
Copy link
Owner Author

Okay, this is starting to work:
image

7e8af60

Still have some things to work out, such as:

  • What do I do if there are multiple loci that all produce the same gene product? Thinking here TgrB and TgrC seem to come from multiple genes, and PKA has both a regulatory and catalytic subunit.

  • How do I incorporate this into a single SVG file? Or an HTML file that has the CSS in the header? I'm not sure what's the best way to proceed.

  • Several of these have SNPs that are almost as strong towards the Stalk as the spore, but show up only as one or the other.

  • Best way to embed a colorscale?

@petercombs
Copy link
Owner Author

In lab meeting, it was pointed out that classifying SNPs are "stalk biased" or "spore biased" doesn't make a ton of sense, since if you switch the reference and alternate alleles, the classification switches. So maybe just coloring by the highest p-value, regardless of "direction" is the better way to do it.

Other comments:

  • Try using cytoscape to visualize the pathways.
  • Try reannotating GO terms by looking at orthologs in closely related organisms (plasmodium? yeast??)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant