-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Empty results file from the workflow: Metabolomics LCMSMS CAMERA MetFrag processing and annotation #20
Comments
Hi, is this the default example? Can you change the database from KEGG to PubChem in the msms2metfrag node. KEGG is a rather small database oftentimes causing no matching candidates given the precursor information. With PubChem there should be hits. Just let me know. |
Hi, thank you for your answer. Now it works, but I got only eight files, each of which is one peak compared with the database. But I have more than hundred of peaks, how can I search the rest peaks? |
Hi again, well this is not easy to answer as the peak picking and grouping in the workflow is dependent on the setting of the parameters of the single tools. It might be that only 8 peaks are properly annotated with adduct information which is needed for further processing, which is actually not much I have to admit. |
Hi, it was the same with the sample data. And our data is from an untargeted experiment, from which we could identify about 40 metabolites. Please find the file through Google drive. |
Hi, I played a little bit with your dataset and it seems the problem is related to a shift in the precursor masses triggered for MS/MS compared to the masses we find in MS1. The shift is that high that we can simply not map the MS/MS spectra to the corresponding MS1 features by mass. |
Hi Christoph,
thank you for your answer. I have checked the data and found out that
something was wrong with the calibration. And then I recalibrated the
masses and generated a new file. It seems that the new file works in
Galaxy. There were over 7000 result files generated. Unfortunately, an
error occurred in the workflow and I could not see the results. It would be
nice if you can look at the new file.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByrBWp68y7ULQmEwNENqYmViOWM
Some examples that have MSMS spectra are Glutamate, Phenylalanine and many
more if you need them.
Thank you!
Daqiang
2017-10-12 10:08 GMT+02:00 c-ruttkies <[email protected]>:
… Hi, I played a little bit with your dataset and it seems the problem is
related to a shift in the precursor masses triggered for MS/MS compared to
the masses we find in MS1. The shift is that high that we can simply not
map the MS/MS spectra to the corresponding MS1 features by mass.
Do you have an example compound from that you know it's in your data and
has a MS/MS spectrum?
Thanks in advance.
Christoph
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#20 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AelDZoj045BFEadb9DuVZutiShHK368mks5srcj4gaJpZM4Pa4qV>
.
|
I used the supplied data with this workflow and it could run without error, but in the end, I got only empty result files. Can anybody check it and fix this issue? Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: