Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UV #16

Open
richterdavid opened this issue Mar 30, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

UV #16

richterdavid opened this issue Mar 30, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@richterdavid
Copy link

Consider adding a standard for the use of FarUV (222nm) and/or near UV-C (254nm)

@joshsimmons
Copy link
Member

Oh fascinating, this is not something I had considered! My instinct is that this might be a better fit for suggestions in an Organizer Guide, rather than in a badging standard. Do you have some links I can dig into to learn more or incorporate directly into documentation?

Also: THANK YOU! For this and the other suggestions 💖

@richterdavid
Copy link
Author

How technical and detailed do you want?

@richterdavid
Copy link
Author

For near UV-C, there's this chapter from ASHRAE: https://www.ashrae.org/file%20library/technical%20resources/covid-19/i-p_a19_ch62_uvairandsurfacetreatment.pdf

Far UV-C is not yet integrated into air quality standards from organizations like ASHRAE, which tend to be more conservative. I'll find some sources for you.

@richterdavid
Copy link
Author

Below are some recent papers on Far UV-C. Generally speaking, reasonable levels of exposure appear to be safe for humans, while reducing "live" virii by orders of magnitude. Effects on bacterial and fungi are more variable, with some susceptible and others not.

https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fv15071463
https://doi.org/10.1111/php.13866
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-57441-z
https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.159

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants