You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In issue #40 I suggested adding methods for particles so we can allow for pushers such as
Vay
Higuera
Li
(and others?)
to be specified by PICMI. Today Jean Luc extended on this idea and say that particles methods should include pusher, charge deposition, and force interpolation. So I am proposing the following specificaitons for particles.
(1) pusher type (see above)
(2) particle shape (an integer for a spline order?)
(3) energy or momentum conserving force interpolation
(4) charge conservation (logical flag): is the charge deposition charge conserving? (full EM only)
I think that will cover all the EM PIC codes. Please feel free to comment here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In issue #40 I suggested adding methods for particles so we can allow for pushers such as
Vay
Higuera
Li
(and others?)
to be specified by PICMI. Today Jean Luc extended on this idea and say that particles methods should include pusher, charge deposition, and force interpolation. So I am proposing the following specificaitons for particles.
(1) pusher type (see above)
(2) particle shape (an integer for a spline order?)
(3) energy or momentum conserving force interpolation
(4) charge conservation (logical flag): is the charge deposition charge conserving? (full EM only)
I think that will cover all the EM PIC codes. Please feel free to comment here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: