You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I use action-gh-release, some older changes exist.
For example, I released v0.46.0 from v0.45.4. I expected the release note to include changes from v0.45.4 to HEAD commit, but there were some changes created at older than v0.45.4.
The list contains from v0.N.0, which is the common ancestor of release-v0.N.x and master.
(e.g. v0.49.0...c0392f596b8e50b05cf896a8b1707d70614120c7 for v0.49.3)
The tool lists commits of <previous-tag>...<head> in the master branch.
(e.g. v0.49.2...c0392f596b8e50b05cf896a8b1707d70614120c7 for v0.49.3 release)
Patch release tags are put to release-v0.N.x, not master,
Why not happened previously?
Previously, this problem did not exist because the release flow was different.
The feature of automatically creating a Release was turned off in #3701 (The reason is not sure...).
At that time, the release flow of release-v0.N.x did not exist.
Solution (not full answer)
We need to change the release flow. The tool should list commits in release-v0.N.zAFTER cherry-picking.
Listing commits in master branch is NOT enough because it contains several commits which would not be released as patch (e.g. pipedv1-related).
What happened:
When I use
action-gh-release
, some older changes exist.For example, I released
v0.46.0
fromv0.45.4
. I expected the release note to include changes fromv0.45.4
to HEAD commit, but there were some changes created at older thanv0.45.4
.#4775 (comment)
Maybe it looks like changes from
v0.45.0
to HEAD commit because the last one is the next to the merged commit forv0.45.0
.https://github.com/pipe-cd/pipecd/commits/master/?after=49627aa0e3dcd29c30d3f251813ac36f077ebb25+104
What you expected to happen:
We hope to include the correct changes like from
v0.45.4
tov0.46.0
.How to reproduce it:
Environment:
piped
version:control-plane
version:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: