We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I think someone suggested this before but I can't find it. Maybe it was just me?
I don’t think any of these rules is extension-specific, so it can be shared with other repos
https://github.com/pixiebrix/pixiebrix-extension/blob/main/eslint-local-rules/
"local-rules/noNullRtkQueryArgs": "error", "local-rules/noInvalidDataTestId": "error", "local-rules/noExpressionLiterals": "error", "local-rules/notBothLabelAndLockableProps": "error", "local-rules/preferNullish": "warn", "local-rules/preferNullishable": "warn",
Only persistBackgroundData and noCrossBoundaryImports are really specific to the extension I think.
persistBackgroundData
noCrossBoundaryImports
cc @grahamlangford @fungairino
no-restricted-syntax
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm curious why we have our own version of https://github.com/testing-library/eslint-plugin-testing-library/blob/main/docs/rules/consistent-data-testid.md
Sorry, something went wrong.
cc @BLoe for pixiebrix/pixiebrix-extension#5466
Probably because we hadn't added the Testing Library ESLint plugin yet
Yeah we either didn't know a rule existed already or we just had not added that plugin yet 🤷♂️
No branches or pull requests
I think someone suggested this before but I can't find it. Maybe it was just me?
I don’t think any of these rules is extension-specific, so it can be shared with other repos
https://github.com/pixiebrix/pixiebrix-extension/blob/main/eslint-local-rules/
Only
persistBackgroundData
andnoCrossBoundaryImports
are really specific to the extension I think.cc @grahamlangford @fungairino
Related
no-restricted-syntax
rules from the extension to the shared config #186The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: