Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Silicon Labs EFM8 Support #1862

Open
Si03 opened this issue Sep 26, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Silicon Labs EFM8 Support #1862

Si03 opened this issue Sep 26, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@Si03
Copy link

Si03 commented Sep 26, 2018

  • [X ] Feature Request.

Hi,
I see there is EFM32 support, so are there any plans to support the 8-bit range of Silabs devices?
The tools supplied by Silabs are ok (Simplicity Studio), but we would like to work in VSCode which is a more familiar environment where we can be more productive and have a workflow common to other device platforms.
Thanks,
Si.

@ivankravets ivankravets changed the title Feature Req: Silabs EFM8 Support Silicon Labs EFM8 Support Oct 3, 2018
@zerog2k
Copy link

zerog2k commented Nov 19, 2018

there is generic 8051 support now via platform intel_mcs51, however no explicit support for efm8, although this can be added by anyone who wants to take this on.
I believe it would be functionally equivalent to supporting c8051 (earlier 8051 silabs series, i think they are probably same/similar cores), as requested in platformio/platform-intel_mcs51#7

adding the basic cpu support would be easy - the challenge may lie in adding product-line specific library/sdk for efm8 and/or c8051, as well as supporting native upload (i.e. via some c2 programmer option)

@EduardoOn45
Copy link

"Adding the basic cpu support would be easy - the challenge may lie in adding product-line specific library/sdk for EFM8 and/or c8051, as well as supporting native upload (i.e. via some c2 programmer option)"

Exactly! It would be very nice.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants