We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Copying from pyopensci review:
I would change trove classifiers the package is not in beta annymore if you are using in the lab you can also specify specific pythons: 3.7, etc You probably want to raise the minimum python requires and adhere to SPEC0 since you are depending on core scientific python libraries right now core packages are at 3.10-3.12, but if you need numba then you might need to raise it to 3.9 and test on 3.9-3.11 since numba/numba#9197
I would change trove classifiers
You probably want to raise the minimum python requires and adhere to SPEC0 since you are depending on core scientific python libraries
right now core packages are at 3.10-3.12, but if you need numba then you might need to raise it to 3.9 and test on 3.9-3.11 since numba/numba#9197
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
billbrod
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Copying from pyopensci review:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: