We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We would like to make the process of running eflux3 as simple as possible. A standard run of our code should be a simple one-liner:
eflux3
condition_specific_fluxes = eflux3(cobra_model, transcriptomics)
where the condition_specific_fluxes and transcriptomics are either pandas dataframes or dict, and the cobra_model is a cobrapy compatible model.
condition_specific_fluxes
transcriptomics
pandas
dict
We can also have named arguments such as reference_strain, solver, etc.
reference_strain
solver
Note: We should allow for output type to be single valued fluxes versus triangular distribution parameters (lower,center,upper).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
We would like to make the process of running
eflux3
as simple as possible. A standard run of our code should be a simple one-liner:where the
condition_specific_fluxes
andtranscriptomics
are eitherpandas
dataframes ordict
, and the cobra_model is a cobrapy compatible model.We can also have named arguments such as
reference_strain
,solver
, etc.Note: We should allow for output type to be single valued fluxes versus triangular distribution parameters (lower,center,upper).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: