Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Zero fluxes in Eflux #29

Open
djinnome opened this issue Sep 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Zero fluxes in Eflux #29

djinnome opened this issue Sep 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@djinnome
Copy link
Contributor

djinnome commented Sep 17, 2024

Hi @djinnome ,

I'm trying to set up Eflux2 for the putida model.

I ran FBA on the model and got rid of the reactions with zero fluxes. However, when I ran FBA on the model whose zero-flux reactions had been removed, there were more reactions whose fluxes were zero.

Is this normal? This is throwing me off when setting up Eflux2 because, as you know, Eflux2 gives v_star values, none of which can be zero.

Here is the notebook I was using to make the new putida model.
There is a section called "Removing 0-flux reactions"

Thank you,

@janisshin

@mcnaughtonadm mcnaughtonadm self-assigned this Sep 17, 2024
@mcnaughtonadm mcnaughtonadm added the bug Something isn't working label Sep 17, 2024
@janisshin
Copy link

I've figured out that it's because I was creating the model with one conda env and then running eflux2 with another conda env.
Running the command model.optimize() yields different results between the two envs.

Weirdly enough, in both conda envs, I have the same version of cobra, 0.29.0, but different versions of numpy, 1.24.0 vs. 1.23.4 It is not dependent on the use of model.solver = 'gurobi'

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants