Thanks @appieschot for writing out these specs. I've got a few remarks before we can continue:

• We don't need to specify any default properties for a get command.
• For url, name and id. The description specifies both which refers to two items but we've three options here.
• For the description of the second example, let's leave out the GUID from there. It doesn't have that much meaning.
• The description of asAdmin, is that correct? I don't think this has anything to do with AI builder models.

Fixed point 1, 3 and 4. Not sure what you mean with the 2nd point .. You have to specify one of the three options, not two .. Or atleast that was what I was trying to convey.

In point 2, I'm referring to the definition of both. Your sentence mentions three options and ends with but not both. Both typically refers to two items, but we have three here. I suggest we just remove but not both from the sentence. That would make it similar to how we do it with targeting lists, e.g., https://pnp.github.io/cli-microsoft365/cmd/spo/listitem/listitem-add.

Also, when we specify the options in our description, we can leave out the [ ] chars.

Done

May I work on this!

May I work on this!

all yours 👍

Hey @ktskumar, thank you for all the hard work you’ve put in, it’s really appreciated! We’ve noticed that you have several issues assigned that haven't yet been created with a PR. To ensure everyone has a chance to get involved, especially with Hacktoberfest, I’ll be unassigning you from some of these issues.

We recommend focusing on 1 to 2 issues at a time. Once you’ve submitted a PR for an issue, you can easily claim another open one. This approach helps you manage the workload more effectively and ensures you can give each task the attention it needs.

Thanks again for your continued contributions!

let me work on this..

Hi @ktskumar, as @Jwaegebaert mentioned, we recommend that people focus on 1-2 issues at a time. Since you have 2 issues assigned to you without a PR, we recommend finishing these before claiming other issues. This will give other contributors the chance to work on this repo as well.

Hi team! I'd love to help out with this issue. Is it okay if I take it up?

Definitely!

As per my understanding, this api.powerplatform.com is treated as you were an admin and there isn't a distinct between 'normal' and 'asAdmin'. Couldn't really find an answer in the documentation.

@appieschot, you have more insights in this matter?

You might be right; I have not investigated this in too much detail. If that is the case perhaps, we can best skip the --asAdmin property!

And sorry for the delay! 🙇‍♂️