Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

💡 [Feature]: Improve /manage chat command behavior #353

Closed
3 tasks done
Adam-it opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

💡 [Feature]: Improve /manage chat command behavior #353

Adam-it opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
⭐ enhancement New feature or request 🧺 epic Group larger topics
Milestone

Comments

@Adam-it
Copy link
Member

Adam-it commented Nov 19, 2024

🎯 Aim of the feature

Sometimes we may not get any response from the /manage chat command even though the response was present or the error message would provide more context to help the dev. We may correct the following

📷 Images (if possible) with expected result

image

🤔 Additional remarks or comments

No response

@Adam-it Adam-it added ⭐ enhancement New feature or request 🙏 help wanted Open for contributors labels Nov 19, 2024
@Adam-it Adam-it added this to the v4.X milestone Nov 25, 2024
@nicodecleyre
Copy link
Contributor

Can i work on this one?

@Adam-it
Copy link
Member Author

Adam-it commented Dec 1, 2024

Can i work on this one?

Sorry @nicodecleyre but I think I forgot to update this issue.
Let's put this on hold until I finish #344
Which I am currently investigating.
When we refactor the chat participant to use prompt-tsx it the logic will be totally different than now as we will define prompts in tsx.
Also this will get us unblocked in managing priortizations in long prompts and chunking in long prompts which in current implementation is not supported.

May I kindly as you for now to pick a different issue 🙏.
Sorry for the confusion

@Adam-it Adam-it added 🤚 on hold I need to wait for something else and removed 🙏 help wanted Open for contributors labels Dec 1, 2024
@Adam-it Adam-it added 🧺 epic Group larger topics and removed 🤚 on hold I need to wait for something else labels Dec 9, 2024
@Adam-it
Copy link
Member Author

Adam-it commented Dec 9, 2024

closing this as I extracted the points in this issue to smaller separate issues so that we may have some work unblocked

@Adam-it Adam-it closed this as completed Dec 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⭐ enhancement New feature or request 🧺 epic Group larger topics
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants