Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Slow down decay rate of enclosing methods #232

Closed
khatchad opened this issue Sep 5, 2019 · 9 comments
Closed

Slow down decay rate of enclosing methods #232

khatchad opened this issue Sep 5, 2019 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working doi question Further information is requested

Comments

@khatchad
Copy link
Member

khatchad commented Sep 5, 2019

Highly related to #224. In fact, this should have been fixed since #224 was merged. What happened? If #224 was merged, why do we have this problem still (or do we not)? What was the new decay rate there?

The decay rate may have to be tied to the project being analyzed, e.g., number of commits, SLOC.

@khatchad khatchad added bug Something isn't working question Further information is requested doi labels Sep 5, 2019
@khatchad khatchad added this to the Decay rate enhancements milestone Sep 5, 2019
@khatchad
Copy link
Member Author

khatchad commented Sep 5, 2019

Highly related to #217.

@yiming-tang-cs
Copy link
Contributor

yiming-tang-cs commented Sep 9, 2019

original decay /64
results_decay_64.zip

original decay:
results_original_decay.zip

commits:24000
I tried 1000, but the number of candidates is small. 24000 is much better.

I will try more decays.

@yiming-tang-cs
Copy link
Contributor

yiming-tang-cs commented Sep 9, 2019

original decay/16:
results_div_16.zip

original decay/32:
results_div_32.zip

original decay/128:
results_div_128.zip

original decay/256:
results_div_256.zip

@khatchad
Copy link
Member Author

Please try 16 and 256 on:

  • One medium subject.
  • One small subject.

@yiming-tang-cs
Copy link
Contributor

I tried one small subject: reactiondecoder, but there is no candidate in the results. I need to find another one.

Reaction_Decoder.zip

@yiming-tang-cs
Copy link
Contributor

This result below is interesting. So many candidates but no transformation.
results_IRCT_API.zip

@yiming-tang-cs
Copy link
Contributor

By looking at results for IRCT_API, I think we need to fix #236 before doing this. IRCT-API is a good small project for this issue.

@khatchad
Copy link
Member Author

khatchad commented Sep 13, 2019 via email

@khatchad
Copy link
Member Author

Blocked on #236.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working doi question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants