We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For the Sequoia Interop Tests, the sequoia team wrote an SOP wrapper/module for RNP.
We should consider supporting our v6 functionality also through this SOP interface if this is possible without investing too much time.
Tasks are:
Test cases that are relevant to our implemented v6 functionality:
@TJ-91
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Look at Interop Test Suite, then possibly clarify what is left to do.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Changes would need to go here: https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/rnp-sop/-/blob/main/src/lib.rs (Plus, requires RNP to be built with the experimental flags).
However, I am not convinced we should do this. What do you think? Can we close it as not planned?
I wouldn't close it. Maybe this is not urgent, but it still makes sense to consider it for later.
One Problem here is that the v6 and PQC FFI is still only experimental.
TJ-91
No branches or pull requests
For the Sequoia Interop Tests, the sequoia team wrote an SOP wrapper/module for RNP.
We should consider supporting our v6 functionality also through this SOP interface if this is possible without investing too much time.
Tasks are:
Test cases that are relevant to our implemented v6 functionality:
@TJ-91
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: