-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add data augmentation and dc2 psf/deconv #932
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #932 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 95.78% 95.88% +0.09%
==========================================
Files 25 26 +1
Lines 3111 3209 +98
==========================================
+ Hits 2980 3077 +97
- Misses 131 132 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
a078d4b
to
b258fb6
Compare
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
bliss/data_augmentation.py
Outdated
|
||
num_channel = image.size(2) | ||
aug_images = [] | ||
for i in range(num_channel): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same here, it'd be nice not to loop over the channels. We should be able to pad and slice all the channels at once.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's coming along well, see changes request above
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice
will resolve data augmentation #904 and demonstrate that BLISS outperforms the LSST pipeline at cataloging DC2 #898