Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Blinks identified as saccades #26

Open
pdmadeira opened this issue Jun 8, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Blinks identified as saccades #26

pdmadeira opened this issue Jun 8, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@pdmadeira
Copy link

pdmadeira commented Jun 8, 2021

I'm here asking for your help one more time :)
Running the algorithm in my data I noticed that almost all blinks are identified as saccades. Does anyone know a clean way to get around this problem?

Here goes an example:
image
The four highest peaks are blinks but are being misclassified as saccades.

Thanks in advance!

@CloudyDory
Copy link

I suggest you to plot the saccadic main sequence, normally there should be a linear relationship between saccade amplitude and peak saccade velocity. Blinks mis-identified as saccades may be outliers in the plot.

@KevKo1990
Copy link

I am no expert, but it seems that there are no collection gaps when the blinks occur. It seems like that you interpolated missing values? If I am not mistaken, you should include missing values as nan.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants