You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm here asking for your help one more time :)
Running the algorithm in my data I noticed that almost all blinks are identified as saccades. Does anyone know a clean way to get around this problem?
Here goes an example:
The four highest peaks are blinks but are being misclassified as saccades.
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I suggest you to plot the saccadic main sequence, normally there should be a linear relationship between saccade amplitude and peak saccade velocity. Blinks mis-identified as saccades may be outliers in the plot.
I am no expert, but it seems that there are no collection gaps when the blinks occur. It seems like that you interpolated missing values? If I am not mistaken, you should include missing values as nan.
I'm here asking for your help one more time :)
Running the algorithm in my data I noticed that almost all blinks are identified as saccades. Does anyone know a clean way to get around this problem?
Here goes an example:
The four highest peaks are blinks but are being misclassified as saccades.
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: