Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use CiteProc for citations for Alma records #4428

Open
1 of 7 tasks
maxkadel opened this issue Oct 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 7 tasks

Use CiteProc for citations for Alma records #4428

maxkadel opened this issue Oct 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
maintenance Ticket related to maintenance that needs to be done

Comments

@maxkadel
Copy link
Contributor

maxkadel commented Oct 8, 2024

What maintenance needs to be done?

Right now, citations for Alma records are created using the BlacklightMarc gem, and citations for SCSB records are created using local CiteProc-based methods (see #4012).

We want to use CiteProc for all records, to reduce complexity and have consistent behavior between records.

Level of urgency

  • High
  • Moderate
  • Low

Why is this maintenance needed?

  • It will be confusing to users to get somewhat differently-styled citations, based on where the source record is from.
  • It adds complexity to maintain two citation pathways

Acceptance criteria

  • MLA citations all use CiteProc
  • APA citations all use CiteProc
  • Chicago citation all use CiteProc
  • Citations using the BlacklightMarc gem are removed

Implementation notes, if any
@maxkadel maxkadel added the maintenance Ticket related to maintenance that needs to be done label Oct 8, 2024
@maxkadel maxkadel mentioned this issue Oct 9, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
maintenance Ticket related to maintenance that needs to be done
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@maxkadel