Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pure-csi] More human-readable name for dynamically created volumes #197

Open
MrRexZ opened this issue Mar 26, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

[pure-csi] More human-readable name for dynamically created volumes #197

MrRexZ opened this issue Mar 26, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
❔ question Further information is requested 🛑 Hold Waiting on something...

Comments

@MrRexZ
Copy link

MrRexZ commented Mar 26, 2020

With this PR merged, it's possible for the Pure CSI driver to make use of the PVC name & namespace and PV name.
Currently the volumes' generated name are in the following format k8s-{pvc-name}, which makes it more difficult to associate which PVC refers to which volume when looking at a glance.

@sdodsley
Copy link
Collaborator

sdodsley commented Apr 2, 2020

@MrRexZ We would have to wait until that PR gets into a release, probably 1.6.0 when that is out. Then we can investigate

@sdodsley sdodsley added the ❔ question Further information is requested label Apr 2, 2020
@sdodsley sdodsley added the 🛑 Hold Waiting on something... label Apr 17, 2020
@TJM
Copy link

TJM commented Sep 10, 2020

This sounds like it would be really awesome! One of our biggest complaints is that we have to have a magic decoder ring to figure out which volume is causing alerts for the storage team.

@sdodsley
Copy link
Collaborator

@TJM @MrRexZ you may want to investigate PSO eXplorer - our Open Source GUI to visualize these connections.
https://github.com/PureStorage-OpenConnect/pso-explorer

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
❔ question Further information is requested 🛑 Hold Waiting on something...
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants