Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

clearsky algorithm with POA data? #107

Open
toddkarin opened this issue May 3, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

clearsky algorithm with POA data? #107

toddkarin opened this issue May 3, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@toddkarin
Copy link

What is the expected behavior of the clear sky algorithm applied to plane-of-array data?

@cwhanse
Copy link
Member

cwhanse commented May 3, 2021

Are you asking about features.clearsky.reno?

@toddkarin
Copy link
Author

toddkarin commented May 4, 2021

Yes, either with fixed tilt or single-axis tracking.

@cwhanse
Copy link
Member

cwhanse commented May 4, 2021

If the clear-sky profile is transposed to the plane-of-array, then I think the algorithm would reasonably label clear-sky periods in plane-of-array data. To be explicit: the plane-of-array irradiance is passed to ghi, and the transposed clearsky GHI is passed to ghi_clearsky.

The thresholds aren't exposed in this interface. The thresholds are probably OK for plane-of-array data, ideally at 1 minute. If the irradiance data are at longer intervals, out to 15min, there's evidence that the same thresholds work, but no formal validation.

@wholmgren
Copy link
Member

I did this a few years ago and found the thresholds were difficult to tweak. I had more success converting POA to GHI using pvlib.irradiance.gti_dirint and then applying pvlib.clearsky.detect_clearsky.

@wfvining wfvining added the question Further information is requested label May 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants