Submission for ANDES #176
Labels
0/pre-review-checks
New Submission!
on-hold
A tag to represent packages on review hold until we figure out a bigger issue associate with review
Submitting Author: Jinning Wang (@jinningwang)
All current maintainers: Hantao Cui (@cuihantao), Jinning Wang (@jinningwang )
Package Name: ANDES
One-Line Description of Package: Power system transient dynamics simulation with symbolic modeling and numerical analysis
Repository Link: https://github.com/CURENT/andes
Version submitted: v1.9.1
Editor: TBD
Reviewer 1: TBD
Reviewer 2: TBD
Archive: TBD
JOSS DOI: TBD
Version accepted: TBD
Date accepted (month/day/year): TBD
Code of Conduct & Commitment to Maintain Package
Description
ANDES is an open-source Python library for power system modeling, computation, analysis, and control, serving as the core simulation engine for the CURENT Large scale Testbed (LTB). It supports power flow calculation, transient stability simulation, and small-signal stability analysis for transmission systems. ANDES implements a symbolic-numeric framework for rapid prototyping of differential-algebraic equation-based models.
Scope
Please indicate which category or categories.
Check out our package scope page to learn more about our
scope. (If you are unsure of which category you fit, we suggest you make a pre-submission inquiry):
Domain Specific
Community Partnerships
If your package is associated with an
existing community please check below:
For all submissions, explain how the and why the package falls under the categories you indicated above. In your explanation, please address the following points (briefly, 1-2 sentences for each):
Who is the target audience and what are scientific applications of this package?
Power system researchers and engineers.
Power system transient stability modeling and analysis.
Are there other Python packages that accomplish the same thing? If so, how does yours differ?
To the best of my knowledge, ANDES is the only python package, for power system transient stability modeling and simulation, with the proposed hybrid symbolic-numeric method.
If you made a pre-submission enquiry, please paste the link to the corresponding issue, forum post, or other discussion, or
@tag
the editor you contacted:Technical checks
For details about the pyOpenSci packaging requirements, see our packaging guide. Confirm each of the following by checking the box. This package:
Publication Options
JOSS Checks
paper.md
matching JOSS's requirements with a high-level description in the package root or ininst/
.Note: JOSS accepts our review as theirs. You will NOT need to go through another full review. JOSS will only review your paper.md file. Be sure to link to this pyOpenSci issue when a JOSS issue is opened for your package. Also be sure to tell the JOSS editor that this is a pyOpenSci reviewed package once you reach this step.
Are you OK with Reviewers Submitting Issues and/or pull requests to your Repo Directly?
This option will allow reviewers to open smaller issues that can then be linked to PR's rather than submitting a more dense text based review. It will also allow you to demonstrate addressing the issue via PR links.
Confirm each of the following by checking the box.
Please fill out our survey
submission and improve our peer review process. We will also ask our reviewers
and editors to fill this out.
P.S. Have feedback/comments about our review process? Leave a comment here
Editor and Review Templates
The
editor template can be found here.
The review template can be found here.
Footnotes
Please fill out a pre-submission inquiry before submitting a data visualization package. ↩
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: