You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's pretty common in practice for the anode and cathode to have different heights and widths (usually by a small margin, admittedly). However, PyBaMM forces them to be the same by not providing separate dimensions for the negative and positive electrodes. This can be compensated by changing the maximum concentration, but this approach is unphysical. Should we change them to be separate?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes. But that means that the assumption is that the overhang doesn't participate at all, which I doubt is true, though surprisingly, I can't find a 3d study revealing the answer
It's pretty common in practice for the anode and cathode to have different heights and widths (usually by a small margin, admittedly). However, PyBaMM forces them to be the same by not providing separate dimensions for the negative and positive electrodes. This can be compensated by changing the maximum concentration, but this approach is unphysical. Should we change them to be separate?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: