It looks like the 2441V has a lot of differences on the command set from the 2441TH that's currently coded. I've been continuing to look at this when I get time, and ran across this this morning:

Topic: 14f855.extended_get_response.direct data: {'cmd1': 46, 'cmd2': 0, 'target': 34788c, 'user_data': 01.01.01.09.41.4b.44.02.00.00.00.00.00.ae, 'hops_left': 1}
Topic: handler.14f855.extended_get_response.direct data: {'group': 1, 'data': OrderedDict([('data3', 1), ('data4', 9), ('data5', 65), ('data6', 75), ('data7', 68), ('data8', 2), ('data9', 0), ('data10', 0), ('data11', 0), ('data12', 0), ('data13', 0), ('data14', 174)])}

which is all accurate according the 2441v docs (page 8), but that return format is completely different than the 2441TH (page 14) response for a status request. I have a feeling that the set commands are going to be the same as well.

I'm more than happy to finish up a PR to add this thermostat type, but if you could point me to another device to model this off of I'd appreciate it - this is more complex python than I'm used to so modeling after something helps a lot! Also if you have any opinions on naming - that's always a hard topic! :)

I believe all the commands for this are now working. Most of the changes seem reasonable, but the device_type change seems a bit more copy pasta than is good, but I'm also not sure how to improve it without refactoring the thermostat a whole lot more (which is also probably beyond my skillset).

@teharris1 trying not to harass you, but would you be able to give me some feedback on this so I can make whatever changes I need to and get this merged in?

@jlambert121 Sorry I had drafted a response and never hit comment. Thank you very much for this PR. Thermostats are a tough device so it is easy to see why you had issues. I agree with your concern there is a lot of copy and paste in this and there is an attempt to modify existing classes to adjust to the 2441v. I would suggest you do the following:

1. Create a ThermostatBase that includes all base methods for a thermostat class that all thermostats can derive from.
2. If a handler is different than the current handlers, please use a separate file for them rather than putting them into the same file. I am going to be moving to a model of one file has only one class. This is currently violated in the device_types module but I am going to change that soon.

If you can make those changes, I will review it in detail and give more feedback.

I started on this this morning and afraid I might make more of a mess trying to separate these apart and move stuff around than the value I'd bring - probably best if you do that if it was already on your list. Maybe the climate/thermostat stuff would be a good place to start (selfishly :) ) and then I can rework this onto that pattern?

@teharris1 I can try to help split this out if you'd like, but I don't have the device for testing. I see four new classes in this PR:

class ClimateControl_Thermostat_2441V(Device):
class ThermostatStatusResponseHandler2441V(InboundHandlerBase):
class ThermostatTemperatureHandler2441V(InboundHandlerBase):
class GetThermostatStatus2441V:

Are you asking that all four be separated into base / derived classes? Should all thermostats require a derived class so base is only used for inheritance?

E.g.

class ClimateControl_Thermostat_base(Device):
class ClimateControl_Thermostat_Generic(ClimateControl_Thermostat_base):
class ClimateControl_Thermostat_Wireless(ClimateControl_Thermostat_base):**
class ClimateControl_Thermostat_2441V(ClimateControl_Thermostat_base):

All existing devices using ClimateControl_Thermostat would use ClimateControl_Thermostat_Generic. Then repeat this for all four type of classes as necessary?

**Note: this is a class name change from ClimateControl_WirelessThermostat to ClimateControl_Thermostat_Wireless

Anyway, mock that up and let me know what you prefer and I'll make the changes. I'm not too sure how to get it all tested though.

@teharris1 I haven't tested this at all, but is this more in line with what you were looking to see?

Replaced this thermostat with a different one.

If anyone is willing to continue the work on this, I have a 2441V I can test with. I'd love to get it working here so the changes could be integrated into Home Assistant.