Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expanding timeline #46

Open
takluyver opened this issue Jul 29, 2016 · 7 comments
Open

Expanding timeline #46

takluyver opened this issue Jul 29, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@takluyver
Copy link
Member

The timeline view is already just over the height of the scrolling screen area on my laptop, and there are plenty more projects we hope to get on board. Can we find a better way to display this information with a large number of projects? I'd rather not have to filter which projects get to be on the timeline.

@astrofrog
Copy link
Contributor

One solution that would improve things a bit is to make the version bars 1/3 of their current thickness and make the version labels appear only when hovering over the bars.

@takluyver
Copy link
Member Author

It looks like this is what we've got to play with:

http://visjs.org/docs/timeline/
http://visjs.org/timeline_examples.html

@brettcannon
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe another approach is to change what the timeline is meant to convey? If the timeline only stated when 2.7 support reaches EOL for a project and when Python 3-only releases start then that would cut down on the number of bars. And if you didn't stack them but instead inlined the markers then that should mostly compress the timeline to only a handful of lines (possibly to 2).

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member

The problem with the timeline is that it lists release schedules. But not all projects have release schedules. Really, you only need one timeline, with markers for each project for when they plan to drop support (maybe multiple markers for projects that distinguish full support from bugfix support). The marker text can contain version numbers if they are available (and if they don't take up too much space).

We can also implement some kind of popover for each project that gives a short plain text description of their plan.

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member

We could also keep the existing version lengths timeline for CPython only. I think it's useful to show how long CPython versions, especially 2.7, have been around. But it makes less sense to show this for the projects.

@astrofrog
Copy link
Contributor

with markers for each project for when they plan to drop support

Maybe two markers: one when they release a version no longer compatible with Python 2, and one when they drop support for the last version that supported Python 2 (for some projects this is different).

But yeah, I agree that having the whole release schedules may be overkill, or could be hidden by default and shown if the user clicks.

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member

That's what I mean by full support vs. bugfix support. Not all projects provide support for older releases (SymPy certainly doesn't).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants