Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Reducing eval vision tests runtime #2022

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

SalmanMohammadi
Copy link
Collaborator

Context

What is the purpose of this PR? Is it to

  • add a new feature
  • fix a bug
  • update tests and/or documentation
  • other (please add here)

Please link to any issues this PR addresses.

Changelog

What are the changes made in this PR?
*

Test plan

Please make sure to do each of the following if applicable to your PR. If you're unsure about any one of these just ask and we will happily help. We also have a contributing page for some guidance on contributing.

  • run pre-commit hooks and linters (make sure you've first installed via pre-commit install)
  • add unit tests for any new functionality
  • update docstrings for any new or updated methods or classes
  • run unit tests via pytest tests
  • run recipe tests via pytest tests -m integration_test
  • manually run any new or modified recipes with sufficient proof of correctness
  • include relevant commands and any other artifacts in this summary (pastes of loss curves, eval results, etc.)

UX

If your function changed a public API, please add a dummy example of what the user experience will look like when calling it.
Here is a docstring example
and a tutorial example

  • I did not change any public API
  • I have added an example to docs or docstrings

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Nov 18, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/torchtune/2022

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

✅ No Failures

As of commit bfedad2 with merge base d5c54f3 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Nov 18, 2024
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ def test_meta_eval_vision(self, caplog, monkeypatch, tmpdir, expected_vision_acc
checkpointer.model_type=LLAMA3_VISION \
tokenizer.path=/tmp/test-artifacts/tokenizer_llama3.model \
tokenizer.prompt_template=null \
limit=4 \
limit=1 \
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

At a glance, I'm worried this isn't a good enough signal for changes in the recipe due to the fact that the majority of MMMU is multiple choice.

I'd postulate (ha big word) that a minimum of 3 is good, but I'd like to understand the tradeoff better. What are the run times for 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 vs. 4? Also what are the questions for each subject that come up? Are the open or mc?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These are going to fail due to #1995 (comment) so partly trying to debug that here. The current runtime for 4 samples is ~5 minutes which is pretty terrible.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay it's not coming up anymore so I'm going slightly insane.

Also what are the questions for each subject that come up? Are the open or mc?

They're all MC questions I think.

What are the run times for 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 vs. 4?

The runtime for limit=1 was around 80s, so I'd postulate that 2 is 160s, 3 is 240s, etc.

@SalmanMohammadi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

this branch

224.22s call     tests/recipes/test_eleuther_eval.py::TestEleutherEval::test_meta_eval_vision
212.66s call     tests/recipes/test_eleuther_eval.py::TestEleutherEval::test_hf_eval_vision

vs main

277.36s call     tests/recipes/test_eleuther_eval.py::TestEleutherEval::test_hf_eval_vision
276.25s call     tests/recipes/test_eleuther_eval.py::TestEleutherEval::test_meta_eval_vision

It's timeboxing time. @joecummings I humbly offer my meagre ~2 minutes speedup.

Copy link
Contributor

@joecummings joecummings left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I accept your 2 minute speed up and thank you for your service to this great project.

I solemnly swear we will find a better way to handle this sometime in the future (likely when it starts to annoy us again).

@SalmanMohammadi SalmanMohammadi merged commit abdb5a4 into pytorch:main Nov 19, 2024
17 checks passed
@SalmanMohammadi SalmanMohammadi deleted the make_eval_test_quicker branch November 19, 2024 18:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants