-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
01-mult-kakeya.tex
236 lines (223 loc) · 12.2 KB
/
01-mult-kakeya.tex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
\section{Multilinear Kakeya}
By the discussion in the introduction, functions with Fourier support in boxes near a parabola (left picture) are morally constant on polar boxes (right picture).
We will call boxes ``polar'' if they have the same orientation and the product of lengths of corresponding sides is $1$ (this is morally a special case of ``polar sets'' in convex analysis).
\begin{center}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw (-1,1) to[parabola through={(0,0)}] (1,1);
\begin{scope}[black,cm={0.3,0,0,0.09,(0,0)}]
\draw (-1,0) rectangle (1,1);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}[black,cm={0.3,0.6,0,0.09,(1,1)}]
\draw (-1,0) rectangle (0,1);
\end{scope}
\end{tikzpicture}
\hspace{2cm}
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=3]
\begin{scope}[black,cm={0.09,0,0,0.3,(0,0)}]
\draw (0,0) rectangle (1,1);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}[black,cm={0.09,0,-0.6,0.3,(0.3,0)}]
\draw (0,0) rectangle (1,1);
\end{scope}
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{center}
Let us provisionally call two arcs of the parabola \emph{transverse} if they are separated by more than their combined length.
As one sees in the picture, in dimension $2$ the interaction between two functions with transverse Fourier supports is relatively simple since they are basically constant in two different directions.
In particular, $L^{p}$ norms of their products can be morally computed by Fubini's theorem in terms of $L^{p}$ norms of the individual functions.
This is a big improvement over H\"older's inequality that needs $L^{2p}$ norms of the individual functions.
In this section we will see how transversality works in higher dimensions.
\begin{theorem}[Loomis--Whitney]\label{thm:Loomis-Whitney}
Let $n\geq 2$ and denote by $\pi_j: \R^n \rightarrow \R^{n-1}$ the linear map that forgets the $j^{th}$ coordinate:
\[
\pi_j( x_1, \dotsc, x_n) := (x_1, \dotsc, x_{j-1}, x_{j+1}, \dotsc, x_n).
\]
Suppose that $f_j: \R^{n-1} \to [0,\infty]$ are (measurable) functions.
Then the following integral inequality holds.
\begin{equation}\label{eq:Loomis-Whitney}
\int_{\R^n} \prod_{j=1}^n f_j \left( \pi_j(x) \right)^{\frac{1}{n-1}} \dif x
\le
\prod_{j=1}^n \norm{ f_j }_{L^1(\R^{n-1})}^{\frac{1}{n-1}}.
\end{equation}
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
By induction on $n$.
For $n=2$ the claim \eqref{eq:Loomis-Whitney} is a direct consequence of Fubini's theorem.
Suppose that the claim \eqref{eq:Loomis-Whitney} is known for some $n\geq 2$, we will now show it with $n$ replaced by $n+1$.
By H\"older's inequality, the inductive hypothesis, and again H\"older's inequality we obtain
\begin{align*}
\MoveEqLeft
\int_{\R^{n+1}} \prod_{j=1}^{n+1} f_j \left( \pi_j(x) \right)^{\frac{1}{n}} \dif x\\
&=
\int_{\R} \int_{\R^{n}} \prod_{j=1}^{n} f_j \left( \pi_j(x',x_{n+1}) \right)^{\frac{1}{n}} \cdot f_{n+1}(x')^{\frac{1}{n}} \dif x' \dif x_{n+1}\\
&\leq
\norm{f_{n+1}}_{1}^{1/n} \int_{\R} \Bigl( \int_{\R^{n}} \bigl( \prod_{j=1}^{n} f_j \left( \pi_j(x',x_{n+1}) \right)^{\frac{1}{n}} \bigr)^{n/(n-1)} \dif x' \Bigr)^{(n-1)/n} \dif x_{n+1}\\
&\leq
\norm{f_{n+1}}_{1}^{1/n} \int_{\R} \Bigl( \prod_{j=1}^{n} \norm{ f_j(\cdot,x_{n+1}) }_{L^{1}(\R^{n-1})}^{1/(n-1)} \Bigr)^{(n-1)/n} \dif x_{n+1}\\
&\leq
\norm{f_{n+1}}_{1}^{1/n} \prod_{j=1}^{n} \Bigl(\int_{\R} \norm{ f_j(\cdot,x_{n+1}) }_{L^{1}(\R^{n-1})} \dif x_{n+1} \Bigr)^{1/n}\\
&=
\norm{f_{n+1}}_{1}^{1/n} \prod_{j=1}^{n} \norm{ f_j }_{L^{1}(\R^{n})}^{1/n}
\end{align*}
as claimed.
\end{proof}
We will also use a variant in which the functions are constant in not necessarily othogonal directions.
\begin{corollary}[Affine invariant Loomis--Whitney]\label{cor:aff-inv-Loomis-Whitney}
Let $N_{1},\dotsc,N_{n} \in \R^{n}$ be unit vectors and $f_{j} : N_{j}^{\perp} \to [0,\infty]$ be measurable functions.
Then
\begin{equation}\label{eq:aff-inv-Loomis-Whitney}
\int_{\R^n} \prod_{j=1}^n (f_j \circ \pi_j)^{\frac{1}{n-1}}
\le
\abs[\big]{ N_{1} \wedge \dotsb \wedge N_{n} }^{-\frac{1}{n-1}}
\prod_{j=1}^n \norm{ f_j }_{L^1(N_{j}^{\perp})}^{\frac{1}{n-1}},
\end{equation}
where $\pi_{j}$ denotes the orthogonal projection onto $N_{j}^{\perp}$.
\end{corollary}
We recall that for column vectors $N_{1},\dotsc,N_{n} \in \R^{n}$ we have
\[
\abs[\big]{ N_{1} \wedge \dotsb \wedge N_{n} }
=
\abs*{ \det ( N_{1} \dots N_{n} )}.
\]
We will not be using any other properties of wedge products, so this indentity can be seen as an abbreviation.
\begin{proof}
Let $A$ be the linear map such that $A(e_{j})=N_{j}$, where $e_{1},\dotsc,e_{n}$ is the standard basis of $\R^{n}$.
By a change of variables and Theorem~\ref{thm:Loomis-Whitney} we have
\[
\int_{\R^n} \prod_{j=1}^n (f_j \circ \pi_j)^{\frac{1}{n-1}}
=
\abs{\det A} \int_{\R^n} \prod_{j=1}^n (f_j \circ \pi_j \circ A)^{\frac{1}{n-1}}
\leq
\abs{\det A} \prod_{j=1}^n \norm{f_j \circ \pi_j \circ A}_{L^{1}(e_{j}^{\perp})}^{\frac{1}{n-1}}.
\]
It remains to observe that $\pi_{j} \circ A$, viewed as a map $e_{j}^{\perp} \to N_{j}^{\perp}$, also has determinant $\det A$, so the above equals
\[
=
\abs{\det A} \prod_{j=1}^n \bigl( \abs{\det A}^{-1} \norm{f_j}_{L^{1}(N_{j}^{\perp})} \bigr)^{\frac{1}{n-1}}
=
\abs{\det A}^{-\frac{1}{n-1}} \prod_{j=1}^n \norm{f_j}_{L^{1}(N_{j}^{\perp})}^{\frac{1}{n-1}}.
\qedhere
\]
\end{proof}
The multilinear Kakeya inequality \cite{MR2275834} is a version of Loomis--Whitney in which instead of $n$ single directions we have $n$ families of directions.
The argument presented below (from \cite{MR3300318}) incurs a loss in the passage to a family of directions, and this loss restricts the kind of functions we can consider.
Instead of arbitrary functions $f \circ \pi$ we will use functions that are morally constant at some given scale $r$, and estimate the integral at a larger scale $R$.
An \emph{$r$-tube} is an infinite cylinder of radius $r$, or more precisely the $r$-neighborhood of its \emph{central line}, an affine subspace of dimension $1$.
The \emph{direction} of a tube is a unit vector parallel to its central line (there are two such vectors, the choice is not important).
\begin{theorem}[Multilinear Kakeya]\label{thm:mult-Kakeya}
For every $n\in\N$ and $\epsilon>0$ there exist $C_{1},C_{2}<\infty$ such that the following holds.
Let $0<\nu<1$ and $S_j \subset \mathbb{S}^{n-1}$ be such that for any vectors $v_j \in S_j$,
\[
\abs{ v_1 \wedge \dotsb \wedge v_n } \ge \nu.
\]
Let $r>0$ and for each $j=1,\dotsc,n$ let $\Tubes_{j}$ be a collection of tubes of radius $r$ in $\R^n$ whose directions lie in $S_j$.
Then for any ball $B$ of radius $R \geq r$ and any positive numbers $w_{T}$ we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq:mult-Kakeya}
\int_{B} \prod_{j=1}^n \Bigl( \sum_{T \in \Tubes_{j}} w_{T} \one_{T} \Bigr)^{\frac{1}{n-1}}
\le
C_{1} \nu^{-C_{2}} (R/r)^\epsilon r^{n} \prod_{j=1}^n \Bigl( \sum_{T \in \Tubes_{j}} w_{T} \Bigr)^{\frac{1}{n-1}}
\end{equation}
\end{theorem}
The power of $\nu$ in \eqref{eq:mult-Kakeya} can be taken the same as in the Loomis--Whitney inequality, and the loss $(R/r)^{\epsilon}$ can be removed.
However, this requires a completely different proof \cite{MR2746348} (see also \cite{arxiv:1807.09604} for a more general result).
\begin{proof}
By monotone convergence we may assume that the collections $\Tubes_{j}$ are finite.
By continuity we may assume that all coefficients $w_{T}$ are rational.
By scaling we may assume that they are all integers.
Allowing repetition of tubes in $\Tubes_{j}$ we may assume $w_{T}=1$ for all $T$.
Let $\delta \sim \nu^{C_{3}}$ be a dyadic number with $C_{3} = C_{3}(n,\epsilon)$ to be chosen later.
Replacing $\nu$ by $\nu/2$, say, and partitioning each $S_{j}$ into $O(\delta^{n-1})$ subsets of diameter $\ll \delta$ we may assume that each $S_{j}$ is a ball or radius $\ll \delta$ centered at some $\tilde{e}_{j} \in S^{n-1}$.
This loses a factor $\nu^{-C}$ in \eqref{eq:mult-Kakeya}.
With these reductions, for dyadic numbers $r\leq R$ let $\MK(R,r)$ be the smallest constant such that the inequality
\[
\int_{Q} \prod_{j=1}^n \Bigl( \sum_{T \in \Tubes_{j}} \one_{T} \Bigr)^{\frac{1}{n-1}}
\leq
\MK(R,r) \prod_{j=1}^n \abs{\Tubes_{j}}^{\frac{1}{n-1}}
\]
holds for any collections $\Tubes_{j}$ of tubes of radius $r$ and any cube $Q_{R}$ of side length $R$.
By scaling $\MK(R,r) = r^{n} \MK(R/r,1)$.
Estimating $\sum_{T \in \Tubes_{j}} \one_{T} \leq \abs{\Tubes_{j}}$ it becomes clear that $\MK(R,1) \lesssim R^{n}$.
It suffices to show that in fact $\MK(R,1) \lesssim R^{\epsilon}$.
We will obtain this estimate by going from scale $R$ to scale $1$ in many steps and using the Loomis--Whitney inequality at each step.
Let $\Tubes_{j}$ be collections of $1$-tubes with directions $\delta$-close to $\tilde{e}_{j}$.
We partition $Q_R$ into cubes $Q$ of side length $\sim \delta^{-1}$.
For each such cube $Q$ let $\Tubes_{j}(Q)$ be the set of tubes in $\Tubes_{j}$ that intersect $Q$.
For each $T \in \Tubes_{j}(Q)$, the intersection $T \cap Q$ is contained in a slightly thicker $2$-tube $T^{Q}$ with direction $\tilde{e}_{j}$.
Therefore,
\[
\int_{Q} \prod_{j=1}^n \Bigl( \sum_{T \in \Tubes_{j}} \one_{T} \Bigr)^{\frac{1}{n-1}}
=
\int_{Q} \prod_{j=1}^n \Bigl( \sum_{T \in \Tubes_{j}(Q)} \one_{T} \Bigr)^{\frac{1}{n-1}}
\leq
\int_{Q} \prod_{j=1}^n \Bigl( \sum_{T \in \Tubes_{j}} \one_{T^{Q}} \Bigr)^{\frac{1}{n-1}}.
\]
This last integral involves only $\tilde{e}_{j}$-parallel tubes of radius $2$, and by the Loomis--Whitney inequality it is
\[
\le
\nu^{-1/(n-1)} C_n \prod_{j=1}^n \abs{\Tubes_j(Q)}^{\frac{1}{n-1}}.
\]
\begin{center}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw (-1,-1) rectangle (1,1);
\draw (-1,-1) node[left] {$Q$};
\draw (-2.5,-0.25) rectangle (2.5,0.25) (2.5,0) node[right] {$T^{Q}$};
\draw[rotate=7] (-2.5,-0.1) rectangle (2.5,0.1) node[right] {$T$};
\draw[rotate=7,dashed] (-2.5,-1.1) rectangle (2.5,1.1) node[right] {$\delta^{-1} T$};
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{center}
For each $T \in \Tubes_{j}(Q)$ we have $\delta^{-1} T \supset Q$, where $\delta^{-1} T$ is the $\delta^{-1}$-tube with the same central line as $T$.
Therefore,
\[
\prod_{j=1}^n \abs{\Tubes_j(Q)}^{\frac{1}{n-1}}
\le
C_n \abs{Q}^{-1} \int_Q \prod_{j=1}^n \Bigl( \sum_{T \in \Tubes_{j}} \one_{\delta^{-1}T} \Bigr)^{\frac{1}{n-1}}.
\]
Summing over the cubes $Q$ we get
\[
\int_{Q_{R}} \prod_{j=1}^n \Bigl( \sum_{T \in \Tubes_{j}} \one_{T} \Bigr)^{\frac{1}{n-1}}
\leq
\nu^{-1/(n-1)} C_{n} \delta^{n} \int_{Q_{R}} \prod_{j=1}^n \Bigl( \sum_{T \in \Tubes_{j}} \one_{\delta^{-1}T} \Bigr)^{\frac{1}{n-1}}.
\]
By definition of $\MK$ the right-hand side is bounded by
\[
\nu^{-1/(n-1)} C_n \delta^{n} \MK(R,\delta^{-1}) \prod_{j=1}^n \abs{\Tubes_{j}}^{\frac{1}{n-1}},
\]
so
\[
\MK(R,1)
\leq
\nu^{-1/(n-1)} C_{n} \delta^{n} \MK(R,\delta^{-1})
=
\nu^{-1/(n-1)} C_{n} \MK(\delta R,1).
\]
Iterating this inequality $\log R/\log \delta^{-1}$ times and using the trivial estimate for $\MK$ at the end we obtain
\[
\MK(R,1) \leq
C'_{n} (\nu^{-1/(n-1)} C_{n})^{\log R/\log \delta^{-1}}
\sim
R^{c \log \nu^{-1}/\log \delta^{-1}}
\sim
R^{c/C''}.
\]
Choosing $C'' = C''(n,\epsilon)$ sufficiently large finishes the proof.
\end{proof}
It is inefficient to use the affine-invariant Loomis--Whitney inequality in each step of the iteration; making a change of variables that maps $\tilde{e}_{j}$ to the standard unit vectors $e_{j}$ at the beginning of the iteration would result in a better dependence on $\nu$.
The above proof of Theorem~\ref{thm:mult-Kakeya} however has the advantage to easily generalize to more general Brascamp--Lieb data, which we will look at later.
Finally, we record what the multilinear Kakeya inequality in Theorem~\ref{thm:mult-Kakeya} tells when applied to general functions.
\begin{corollary}\label{cor:mult-Kakeya:functions}
Let $S_{j} \subset \mathbb{S}^{n-1}$ be finite subsets as in Theorem~\ref{thm:mult-Kakeya}.
Let $0<r<R<\infty$ and for each $v \in S_{j}$ let $\Tubes_{v}$ be a partition $\R^{n}$ into rectangular boxes of size $r \times \dotsm \times r \times R$ whose long axis point in the direction of $v$.
Then for any measurable functions $f_{v}$ on $\R^{n}$ and any ball $B_{R}$ of radius $R$ we have
\[
\int_{B_{R}} \prod_{j=1}^{n} \abs[\Big]{\sum_{v\in S_{j}} f_{v}}^{1/(n-1)}
\lesssim_{\epsilon,\nu} (R/r)^{\epsilon} r^{n}
\prod_{j=1}^{n} \Bigl( \sum_{v\in S_{j}} \sum_{T\in \Tubes_{v} : T\cap B_{R} \neq \emptyset} \sup_{x \in T} \abs{f_{v}(x)} \Bigr)^{1/(n-1)}
\]
\end{corollary}
\begin{proof}
Dominate
\[
\one_{B_{R}}\abs{f_{v}} \leq
\sum_{T\in \Tubes_{v} : T\cap B_{R} \neq \emptyset} \one_{T} \sup_{x \in T} \abs{f_{v}(x)}
\]
and apply \eqref{eq:mult-Kakeya} with $w_{T} = \sup_{x \in T} \abs{f_{v}(x)}$.
\end{proof}