Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automatic Transformer ordering #650

Closed
mrossinek opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Automatic Transformer ordering #650

mrossinek opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
type: feature request New feature or request

Comments

@mrossinek
Copy link
Member

What should we add?

Now that we are adding more transformers (e.g. #640) the ordering in which multiple transformers are applied to a problem becomes relevant. In fact, some of these may require to be executed last or may even be incompatible with other transformers (#48 in the future).

In order to make the life of users easier, we should implement some sort of "priority" label according to which multiple transformers can be ordered and possible even made mutually exclusive.

@mrossinek mrossinek added the type: feature request New feature or request label Apr 27, 2022
@mrossinek
Copy link
Member Author

I am closing this issue because as of Qiskit Nature v0.5.0, transformers are applied by users manually.
It is the responsibility of the user to do so in the correct and sensible order.

We should ensure that our documentation reflects potential mutual exclusivity and/or order dependence.

@mrossinek mrossinek closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Nov 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: feature request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant