You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue aims to consolidate discussions on integrating textual into rich-chat. Previous mentions in issues #3 and #7 touch upon textual's capabilities but diverge from their main topics.
Context:
Issue #3 highlighted textual for its advanced features beyond rich, particularly for clipboard management via clip and its Events API with DOM support, suggesting potential for dynamic text management at runtime.
Issue #7 pointed out textual for improving window resizing functionality while acknowledging its steep learning curve.
Comparative Analysis Against Other Solutions:
Elia exemplifies integration with the OpenAI API. Despite its simplicity, the limited interaction, notably the Input box's one-line restriction and immediate submission upon enter, underscores textual's potential for a more interactive UI.
Considerations:
Choosing between rich combined with prompt-toolkit and adopting textual involves balancing ease of interface design against control and customization complexity. textual offers a visually appealing UI with less effort but demands deep knowledge for customization.
There's no one-size-fits-all solution. Preferences and project goals should guide our choice. While textual promises an elegant interface, achieving our specific needs may require significant development time.
I propose a focused discussion on how textual can meet our project's unique requirements for input and output handling, considering our experiences and the limitations identified in other solutions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Objective:
This issue aims to consolidate discussions on integrating
textual
intorich-chat
. Previous mentions in issues #3 and #7 touch upontextual
's capabilities but diverge from their main topics.Context:
Issue #3 highlighted
textual
for its advanced features beyondrich
, particularly for clipboard management viaclip
and its Events API with DOM support, suggesting potential for dynamic text management at runtime.Issue #7 pointed out
textual
for improving window resizing functionality while acknowledging its steep learning curve.Comparative Analysis Against Other Solutions:
Elia exemplifies integration with the OpenAI API. Despite its simplicity, the limited interaction, notably the
Input
box's one-line restriction and immediate submission upon enter, underscorestextual
's potential for a more interactive UI.Considerations:
Choosing between
rich
combined withprompt-toolkit
and adoptingtextual
involves balancing ease of interface design against control and customization complexity.textual
offers a visually appealing UI with less effort but demands deep knowledge for customization.There's no one-size-fits-all solution. Preferences and project goals should guide our choice. While
textual
promises an elegant interface, achieving our specific needs may require significant development time.I propose a focused discussion on how
textual
can meet our project's unique requirements for input and output handling, considering our experiences and the limitations identified in other solutions.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: