Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider using quickblox as a backend #24

Open
roylines opened this issue Feb 13, 2013 · 3 comments
Open

Consider using quickblox as a backend #24

roylines opened this issue Feb 13, 2013 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@roylines
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@kgutteridge
Copy link
Member

If you want to use one of these Parse is by far the best of the bunch (was
the one I mentioned at the hackday)

Kieran

On 13 February 2013 11:46, Roy Lines [email protected] wrote:


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/24.

Kieran Gutteridge
CTO
Intohand Ltd
Main: +44(0)7709 302 975
Office: The Innovation Centre, Carpenter House, Broad Quay, Bath, BA1
1UD Registered Office: 37 Gt Pulteney St, Bath, BA2 4DA, UK Registered
in England and Wales Company Registration Number 5765736
www.intohand.com www.sitetaga.com

@roylines
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the tip. Trying to find cheaper storage than mongolab. It's all implemented fine, just that I think we will run out of space quickly. I liked the look of quickblox 5gb on free tier!

@roylines
Copy link
Member Author

Would prefer to stick with mongodb if we can though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants