You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For various discussions regarding the direction of the project.
I think the current note is that DGGRIDv8 has changed its API. I haven't fixed up the code rewriters that pull from upstream, so we're not tracking upstream at the moment. That's probably okay for a bit, though #70 asks about that.
@SebKrantz and @edzer have collaborator access to the repo which, I think, should give them the ability to make merges without having to loop me in.
@r-barnes do you want to remain the CRAN maintainer? Otherwise I'd be willing to take that over (assuming that @edzer is not interested?) to handle smaller releases like the present one without your necessary involvement. In that case, the repository policy states:
"When a new maintainer wishes to take over a package, this should be accompanied by the written agreement of the previous maintainer (unless the package has been formally orphaned)."
In this case I would suggest that you submit 3.1.0 to CRAN, indicating me as the maintainer in the description, and replying to the submission e-mail copying me in at [email protected] and communicating the change of maintainer. But let me know what your thoughts are on this.
For various discussions regarding the direction of the project.
I think the current note is that DGGRIDv8 has changed its API. I haven't fixed up the code rewriters that pull from upstream, so we're not tracking upstream at the moment. That's probably okay for a bit, though #70 asks about that.
@SebKrantz and @edzer have collaborator access to the repo which, I think, should give them the ability to make merges without having to loop me in.
CC: @SebKrantz @edzer @sahrk
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: