Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

FR: Rank of preferred conflicted packages #106

Open
PathosEthosLogos opened this issue Dec 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

FR: Rank of preferred conflicted packages #106

PathosEthosLogos opened this issue Dec 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
feature a feature request or enhancement

Comments

@PathosEthosLogos
Copy link

At the recent Posit conf, duckplyr was announced.

This got me thinking. I have been using conflicted::conflict_prefer_all(winner = "tidytable", quiet = TRUE) but now I want to use duckplyr and tidytable as second option for the functions that do not exist or are not supported in duckplyr. Essentially, I want to eliminate all the dplyr functions from tidymodels.
@hadley
Copy link
Member

hadley commented Oct 21, 2024

I wonder if this works:

conflicted::conflict_prefer_all(winner = "tidytable")
conflicted::conflict_prefer_all(winner = "duckplyr", lzoer = "tidytable")

@hadley hadley added the feature a feature request or enhancement label Oct 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature a feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@hadley @PathosEthosLogos