dot_names

[hadley]

dot_names(a = 1, b = 2, 3)
#> [1] "a" "b" NA

It's sometimes useful to capture the names of dotted arguments without evaluating them for generating error messages.

Related to dots_n()

[lionel-]

Would it make sense for dots_names() and dots_n() to have an expand argument? If TRUE, it would expand !!! to give the right answer when tidy dots are enabled. Should probably default to FALSE because this can have side effects or be costly.

Maybe we can also check for !!! when expand is FALSE and either return NA or throw an error.

[hadley]

Or we could choose to make them blind to tidy dots. I think dots_n() and dots_name() are mostly used for generating error messages. It's not clear that they need to support tidy dots (or we could at least wait to implement until we have a concrete need)