-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
RpEfficiencySystematicsAppendix.tex
373 lines (298 loc) · 22.8 KB
/
RpEfficiencySystematicsAppendix.tex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
%%===========================================================%%
%% %%
%% RpEfficiencySystematicsAppendix %%
%% %%
%%===========================================================%%
\chapter{RP track reconstruction efficiency comparison between data and MC}\label{appendix:rpTrackRecoEffSyst}\vspace{-26pt}
%---------------------------
\begin{figure}[h]%\vspace{-34pt}
\centering
\parbox{0.54\textwidth}{
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\vspace{10pt}
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:totalRpRecoEff2D_ED}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=2]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/totalRpRecoEff2D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{minipage}[t][0.64\linewidth][t]{\linewidth}\vspace{10pt}
\caption[Coparison of estimated RP track reconstruction efficiency in 2D and 1D (branch ED).]%
{Comparison of RP track reconstruction efficiency in branch ED estimated with the method described in Sec.~\ref{subsec:rpTrackRecoEffSyst} as a function of $(p_{x},p_{y})$ of proton track (\ref{fig:totalRpRecoEff2D_ED}) and comparison of 1-dimensional projections of efficiencies in a fiducial region marked with green envelope: $p_{x}$ (\ref{fig:totalRpRecoEff1D_ED_px}) and $p_{y}$ (\ref{fig:totalRpRecoEff1D_ED_py}). Lower pad in each subfigure shows the difference between efficiency extracted from the data and elastic scattering MC embedded into zero-bias data. Hatched orange area marks bins without any entries (efficiency incalculable).}\label{fig:totalRpRecoEff_ED}
\end{minipage}
%\vspace{52pt}%
}
\quad
\parbox{0.43\textwidth}{
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:totalRpRecoEff1D_ED_px}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=3]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/dataTotalEff_1D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:totalRpRecoEff1D_ED_py}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=4]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/dataTotalEff_1D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}
\end{subfigure}
}
\end{figure}
%---------------------------
%---------------------------
\begin{figure}\vspace{-154pt}
\centering
\parbox{0.4725\textwidth}{%
\centering%
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=2]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/xiPerBranch.pdf}%
}
\quad
\parbox{0.4725\textwidth}{
\centering\vspace{67pt}
%\begin{minipage}[t][0.64\linewidth][t]{\linewidth}%\vspace{73pt}
\caption[Fractional momentum loss $\xi$ of clean proton tracks before and after implying vetoes in the data and MC (branch ED).]%
{Fractional momentum loss $\xi$ of clean proton tracks in branch ED before and after implying vetoes. Data are represented by opened and filled circles, while elastic MC embedded into zero-bias data is drawn as filled histograms. MC histograms are scaled by the ratio of data and MC yields after imposing vetoes in other STAR detector subsystems. Lower pad shows the ratio of corresponding distributions in the data and MC. Dashed green vertical lines show the $\xi$ range of tracks accepted for the RP track (and also track point) efficiency studies, $|\xi|<0.01$.}\label{fig:rpSystXi_ED}%
%\end{minipage}
}
\end{figure}
%---------------------------
%---------------------------
\begin{figure}[h]%\vspace{-34pt}
\centering
\parbox{0.54\textwidth}{
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\vspace{10pt}
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:totalRpRecoEff2D_WU}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=3]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/totalRpRecoEff2D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{minipage}[t][0.64\linewidth][t]{\linewidth}\vspace{10pt}
\caption[Coparison of estimated RP track reconstruction efficiency in 2D and 1D (branch WU).]%
{Comparison of RP track reconstruction efficiency in branch WU estimated with the method described in Sec.~\ref{subsec:rpTrackRecoEffSyst} as a function of $(p_{x},p_{y})$ of proton track (\ref{fig:totalRpRecoEff2D_WU}) and comparison of 1-dimensional projections of efficiencies in a fiducial region marked with green envelope: $p_{x}$ (\ref{fig:totalRpRecoEff1D_WU_px}) and $p_{y}$ (\ref{fig:totalRpRecoEff1D_WU_py}). Lower pad in each subfigure shows the difference between efficiency extracted from the data and elastic scattering MC embedded into zero-bias data. Hatched orange area marks bins without any entries (efficiency incalculable).}\label{fig:totalRpRecoEff_WU}
\end{minipage}
%\vspace{52pt}%
}
\quad
\parbox{0.43\textwidth}{
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:totalRpRecoEff1D_WU_px}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=5]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/dataTotalEff_1D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:totalRpRecoEff1D_WU_py}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=6]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/dataTotalEff_1D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}
\end{subfigure}
}
\end{figure}
%---------------------------
%---------------------------
\begin{figure}%\vspace{-154pt}
\centering
\parbox{0.4725\textwidth}{%
\centering%
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=3]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/xiPerBranch.pdf}%
}
\quad
\parbox{0.4725\textwidth}{
\centering\vspace{67pt}
%\begin{minipage}[t][0.64\linewidth][t]{\linewidth}%\vspace{73pt}
\caption[Fractional momentum loss $\xi$ of clean proton tracks before and after implying vetoes in the data and MC (branch WU).]%
{Fractional momentum loss $\xi$ of clean proton tracks in branch WU before and after implying vetoes. Data are represented by opened and filled circles, while elastic MC embedded into zero-bias data is drawn as filled histograms. MC histograms are scaled by the ratio of data and MC yields after imposing vetoes in other STAR detector subsystems. Lower pad shows the ratio of corresponding distributions in the data and MC. Dashed green vertical lines show the $\xi$ range of tracks accepted for the RP track (and also track point) efficiency studies, $|\xi|<0.01$.}\label{fig:rpSystXi_WU}%
%\end{minipage}
}
\end{figure}
%---------------------------
%---------------------------
\begin{figure}[h]%\vspace{-100pt}
\centering
\parbox{0.54\textwidth}{
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\vspace{10pt}
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:totalRpRecoEff2D_WD}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=4]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/totalRpRecoEff2D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{minipage}[t][0.64\linewidth][t]{\linewidth}\vspace{10pt}
\caption[Coparison of estimated RP track reconstruction efficiency in 2D and 1D (branch WD).]%
{Comparison of RP track reconstruction efficiency in branch WD estimated with the method described in Sec.~\ref{subsec:rpTrackRecoEffSyst} as a function of $(p_{x},p_{y})$ of proton track (\ref{fig:totalRpRecoEff2D_WD}) and comparison of 1-dimensional projections of efficiencies in a fiducial region marked with green envelope: $p_{x}$ (\ref{fig:totalRpRecoEff1D_WD_px}) and $p_{y}$ (\ref{fig:totalRpRecoEff1D_WD_py}). Lower pad in each subfigure shows the difference between efficiency extracted from the data and elastic scattering MC embedded into zero-bias data. Hatched orange area marks bins without any entries (efficiency incalculable).}\label{fig:totalRpRecoEff_WD}
\end{minipage}
%\vspace{52pt}%
}
\quad
\parbox{0.43\textwidth}{
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:totalRpRecoEff1D_WD_px}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=7]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/dataTotalEff_1D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:totalRpRecoEff1D_WD_py}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=8]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/dataTotalEff_1D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}
\end{subfigure}
}
\end{figure}
%---------------------------
%---------------------------
\begin{figure}%\vspace{-154pt}
\centering
\parbox{0.4725\textwidth}{%
\centering%
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=4]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/xiPerBranch.pdf}%
}
\quad
\parbox{0.4725\textwidth}{
\centering\vspace{67pt}
%\begin{minipage}[t][0.64\linewidth][t]{\linewidth}%\vspace{73pt}
\caption[Fractional momentum loss $\xi$ of clean proton tracks before and after implying vetoes in the data and MC (branch WD).]%
{Fractional momentum loss $\xi$ of clean proton tracks in branch WD before and after implying vetoes. Data are represented by opened and filled circles, while elastic MC embedded into zero-bias data is drawn as filled histograms. MC histograms are scaled by the ratio of data and MC yields after imposing vetoes in other STAR detector subsystems. Lower pad shows the ratio of corresponding distributions in the data and MC. Dashed green vertical lines show the $\xi$ range of tracks accepted for the RP track (and also track point) efficiency studies, $|\xi|<0.01$.}\label{fig:rpSystXi_WD}%
%\end{minipage}
}
\end{figure}
%---------------------------
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% RELATIVE EFFICIENCIES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%---------------------------
\begin{figure}[h]%\vspace{-34pt}
\centering
\parbox{0.4725\textwidth}{
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{%\vspace{10pt}
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_E1D_pxpy}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=3]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/relativeRpRecoEff2D_pxpy.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\addtocounter{subfigure}{1}{
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_E1D_x}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=5]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/dataRelativeEff_1D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}}
\end{subfigure}
}
\quad
\parbox{0.4725\textwidth}{
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\addtocounter{subfigure}{-2}{%\vspace{10pt}
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_E1D_xy}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=3]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/relativeRpRecoEff2D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\addtocounter{subfigure}{1}{
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_E1D_y}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=6]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/dataRelativeEff_1D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}}
\end{subfigure}
}
\caption[Coparison of estimated RP track point reconstruction efficiency in 2D and 1D (detector E1D).]%
{Sample comparison of RP track point reconstruction efficiency (detector E1D) estimated with the method described in Sec.~\ref{subsec:rpTrackPointRecoEffSyst} as a function of $(p_{x},p_{y})$ of proton track (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_E1D_pxpy}), $(x,y)$ position extrapolated from the reference RP (E2D) to the studied RP (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_E1D_xy}), and comparison of 1-dimensional projections of efficiencies in selected ranges of hit position (given in the plot): $x$ (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_E1D_x}) and $y$ (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_E1D_y}). Lower pad in each subfigure shows the difference between efficiency extracted from the data and elastic scattering MC embedded into zero-bias data. Hatched orange area marks bins without any entries (efficiency incalculable). The fiducial region in $(x,y)$ plot is represented by two envelopes which correspond to the extreme accepted values of $z_{vtx}$.%
}\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff_E1D}
\end{figure}
%---------------------------
%---------------------------
\begin{figure}[h]%\vspace{-34pt}
\centering
\parbox{0.4725\textwidth}{
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{%\vspace{10pt}
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_E2D_pxpy}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=4]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/relativeRpRecoEff2D_pxpy.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\addtocounter{subfigure}{1}{
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_E2D_x}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=7]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/dataRelativeEff_1D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}}
\end{subfigure}
}
\quad
\parbox{0.4725\textwidth}{
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\addtocounter{subfigure}{-2}{%\vspace{10pt}
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_E2D_xy}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=4]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/relativeRpRecoEff2D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\addtocounter{subfigure}{1}{
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_E2D_y}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=8]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/dataRelativeEff_1D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}}
\end{subfigure}
}
\caption[Coparison of estimated RP track point reconstruction efficiency in 2D and 1D (detector E2D).]%
{Sample comparison of RP track point reconstruction efficiency (detector E2D) estimated with the method described in Sec.~\ref{subsec:rpTrackPointRecoEffSyst} as a function of $(p_{x},p_{y})$ of proton track (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_E2D_pxpy}), $(x,y)$ position extrapolated from the reference RP (E1D) to the studied RP (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_E2D_xy}), and comparison of 1-dimensional projections of efficiencies in selected ranges of hit position (given in the plot): $x$ (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_E2D_x}) and $y$ (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_E2D_y}). Lower pad in each subfigure shows the difference between efficiency extracted from the data and elastic scattering MC embedded into zero-bias data. Hatched orange area marks bins without any entries (efficiency incalculable). The fiducial region in $(x,y)$ plot is represented by two envelopes which correspond to the extreme accepted values of $z_{vtx}$.%
}\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff_E2D}
\end{figure}
%---------------------------
%---------------------------
\begin{figure}[h]%\vspace{-34pt}
\centering
\parbox{0.4725\textwidth}{
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{%\vspace{10pt}
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_W1U_pxpy}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=5]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/relativeRpRecoEff2D_pxpy.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\addtocounter{subfigure}{1}{
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_W1U_x}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=9]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/dataRelativeEff_1D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}}
\end{subfigure}
}
\quad
\parbox{0.4725\textwidth}{
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\addtocounter{subfigure}{-2}{%\vspace{10pt}
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_W1U_xy}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=5]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/relativeRpRecoEff2D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\addtocounter{subfigure}{1}{
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_W1U_y}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=10]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/dataRelativeEff_1D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}}
\end{subfigure}
}
\caption[Coparison of estimated RP track point reconstruction efficiency in 2D and 1D (detector W1U).]%
{Sample comparison of RP track point reconstruction efficiency (detector W1U) estimated with the method described in Sec.~\ref{subsec:rpTrackPointRecoEffSyst} as a function of $(p_{x},p_{y})$ of proton track (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_W1U_pxpy}), $(x,y)$ position extrapolated from the reference RP (W2U) to the studied RP (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_W1U_xy}), and comparison of 1-dimensional projections of efficiencies in selected ranges of hit position (given in the plot): $x$ (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_W1U_x}) and $y$ (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_W1U_y}). Lower pad in each subfigure shows the difference between efficiency extracted from the data and elastic scattering MC embedded into zero-bias data. Hatched orange area marks bins without any entries (efficiency incalculable). The fiducial region in $(x,y)$ plot is represented by two envelopes which correspond to the extreme accepted values of $z_{vtx}$.%
}\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff_W1U}
\end{figure}
%---------------------------
%---------------------------
\begin{figure}[h]%\vspace{-34pt}
\centering
\parbox{0.4725\textwidth}{
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{%\vspace{10pt}
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_W2U_pxpy}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=6]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/relativeRpRecoEff2D_pxpy.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\addtocounter{subfigure}{1}{
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_W2U_x}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=11]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/dataRelativeEff_1D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}}
\end{subfigure}
}
\quad
\parbox{0.4725\textwidth}{
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\addtocounter{subfigure}{-2}{%\vspace{10pt}
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_W2U_xy}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=6]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/relativeRpRecoEff2D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\addtocounter{subfigure}{1}{
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_W2U_y}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=12]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/dataRelativeEff_1D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}}
\end{subfigure}
}
\caption[Coparison of estimated RP track point reconstruction efficiency in 2D and 1D (detector W2U).]%
{Sample comparison of RP track point reconstruction efficiency (detector W2U) estimated with the method described in Sec.~\ref{subsec:rpTrackPointRecoEffSyst} as a function of $(p_{x},p_{y})$ of proton track (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_W2U_pxpy}), $(x,y)$ position extrapolated from the reference RP (W1U) to the studied RP (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_W2U_xy}), and comparison of 1-dimensional projections of efficiencies in selected ranges of hit position (given in the plot): $x$ (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_W2U_x}) and $y$ (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_W2U_y}). Lower pad in each subfigure shows the difference between efficiency extracted from the data and elastic scattering MC embedded into zero-bias data. Hatched orange area marks bins without any entries (efficiency incalculable). The fiducial region in $(x,y)$ plot is represented by two envelopes which correspond to the extreme accepted values of $z_{vtx}$.%
}\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff_W2U}
\end{figure}
%---------------------------
%---------------------------
\begin{figure}[h]%\vspace{-34pt}
\centering
\parbox{0.4725\textwidth}{
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{%\vspace{10pt}
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_W1D_pxpy}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=7]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/relativeRpRecoEff2D_pxpy.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\addtocounter{subfigure}{1}{
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_W1D_x}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=13]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/dataRelativeEff_1D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}}
\end{subfigure}
}
\quad
\parbox{0.4725\textwidth}{
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\addtocounter{subfigure}{-2}{%\vspace{10pt}
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_W1D_xy}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=7]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/relativeRpRecoEff2D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\addtocounter{subfigure}{1}{
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_W1D_y}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=14]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/dataRelativeEff_1D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}}
\end{subfigure}
}
\caption[Coparison of estimated RP track point reconstruction efficiency in 2D and 1D (detector W1D).]%
{Sample comparison of RP track point reconstruction efficiency (detector W1D) estimated with the method described in Sec.~\ref{subsec:rpTrackPointRecoEffSyst} as a function of $(p_{x},p_{y})$ of proton track (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_W1D_pxpy}), $(x,y)$ position extrapolated from the reference RP (W2D) to the studied RP (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_W1D_xy}), and comparison of 1-dimensional projections of efficiencies in selected ranges of hit position (given in the plot): $x$ (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_W1D_x}) and $y$ (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_W1D_y}). Lower pad in each subfigure shows the difference between efficiency extracted from the data and elastic scattering MC embedded into zero-bias data. Hatched orange area marks bins without any entries (efficiency incalculable). The fiducial region in $(x,y)$ plot is represented by two envelopes which correspond to the extreme accepted values of $z_{vtx}$.%
}\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff_W1D}
\end{figure}
%---------------------------
%---------------------------
\begin{figure}[h]%\vspace{-34pt}
\centering
\parbox{0.4725\textwidth}{
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{%\vspace{10pt}
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_W2D_pxpy}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=8]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/relativeRpRecoEff2D_pxpy.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\addtocounter{subfigure}{1}{
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_W2D_x}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=15]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/dataRelativeEff_1D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}}
\end{subfigure}
}
\quad
\parbox{0.4725\textwidth}{
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\addtocounter{subfigure}{-2}{%\vspace{10pt}
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_W2D_xy}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=8]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/relativeRpRecoEff2D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{\linewidth}{\addtocounter{subfigure}{1}{
\subcaptionbox{\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_W2D_y}}{\includegraphics[width=\linewidth,page=16]{graphics/systematicsEfficiency/RpSyst/dataRelativeEff_1D.pdf}\vspace{-12pt}}}}
\end{subfigure}
}
\caption[Coparison of estimated RP track point reconstruction efficiency in 2D and 1D (detector W2D).]%
{Sample comparison of RP track point reconstruction efficiency (detector W2D) estimated with the method described in Sec.~\ref{subsec:rpTrackPointRecoEffSyst} as a function of $(p_{x},p_{y})$ of proton track (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_W2D_pxpy}), $(x,y)$ position extrapolated from the reference RP (W1D) to the studied RP (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff2D_W2D_xy}), and comparison of 1-dimensional projections of efficiencies in selected ranges of hit position (given in the plot): $x$ (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_W2D_x}) and $y$ (\ref{fig:relativeRpRecoEff1D_W2D_y}). Lower pad in each subfigure shows the difference between efficiency extracted from the data and elastic scattering MC embedded into zero-bias data. Hatched orange area marks bins without any entries (efficiency incalculable). The fiducial region in $(x,y)$ plot is represented by two envelopes which correspond to the extreme accepted values of $z_{vtx}$.%
}\label{fig:relativeRpRecoEff_W2D}
\end{figure}
%---------------------------