-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 120
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhancement request: "icon-only" mode for due, t and rec #571
Comments
Removed the bug label since this is not a bug. |
This is an automated response. We acknowledge your report, and we appreciate your engagement. However, as there has been no recent activity in this thread, it has been marked as stale. If you have any further feedback or if the matter is still relevant, please do not hesitate to respond. Otherwise, this thread will be automatically closed in 15 days from now. |
Hi, wonder if this might get some consideration now that sleek 2 has stabilized. On small screens, as in a 2-in-1, this might be useful. |
@callegar I think this should be touched only in the bigger picture of a proper However this is an collaborative project and there is a likelihood, someone will pick it up. |
Bug Report
IMPORTANT:
Please follow this template strictly when reporting bugs. Providing detailed and accurate information helps the development team to understand and address the issue effectively.
App Version: 2.0.2
Platform: Linux
Installation Method: Direct download of appimage from github
Bug Description:
The due and rec fields take a lot of space in the display. The view from sleek 1.3 was more compact since only an icon was used for the due field (taking different colors depending on how close the deadline) and the rec field, with tooltips showing the actual values. Furthermore, I think that in most cases there is really no need to show the t field at all while not editing a task. The current view often has the due, rec, t fields taking up as much space as the task description itself, which is a bit distracting.
While some may prefer this arrangement, having the old one under an option would be nice.
Steps to Reproduce:
See desc.
Expected Behavior:
See desc.
Actual Behavior:
See desc.
Additional Information:
Screenshots:
[If applicable, include screenshots that demonstrate the bug.]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: