From 40d970d1957a4753cdaaec67ac66917af2d0969b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ratrun <ratrun@gmx.at>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 17:29:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add reason for not using REACH_DESTINATION

---
 .../graphhopper/routing/util/parsers/FootPriorityParser.java    | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/core/src/main/java/com/graphhopper/routing/util/parsers/FootPriorityParser.java b/core/src/main/java/com/graphhopper/routing/util/parsers/FootPriorityParser.java
index f7533109c4c..466867cf35a 100644
--- a/core/src/main/java/com/graphhopper/routing/util/parsers/FootPriorityParser.java
+++ b/core/src/main/java/com/graphhopper/routing/util/parsers/FootPriorityParser.java
@@ -105,6 +105,8 @@ void collect(ReaderWay way, TreeMap<Double, PriorityCode> weightToPrioMap) {
             weightToPrioMap.put(100d, PREFER);
 
         if (way.hasTag("foot", "use_sidepath")) {
+            // We use VERY_BAD and not REACH_DESTINATION in order to avoid too long detours, see
+            // https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/foot-use-sidepath-sinnvoll-bei-separat-kartierten-gehwegen/115654
             weightToPrioMap.put(100d, VERY_BAD);
         }