From e0ee8fea351df92797d35264e140786f4e4e68cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacob Parker <jacobparker1992@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 17:42:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Create 0000-use-state-derived-state.md

---
 0000-use-state-derived-state.md | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 0000-use-state-derived-state.md

diff --git a/0000-use-state-derived-state.md b/0000-use-state-derived-state.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ed9b4a4b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/0000-use-state-derived-state.md
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+- Start Date: 2020-03-04
+- RFC PR: (leave this empty)
+- React Issue: (leave this empty)
+
+# Summary
+
+Add a second function argument to `useState` to replicate `getDerivedStateFromProps`.
+
+# Basic example
+
+```js
+const Example = ({ items }) => {
+  const [selectedIndex, setSelectedIndex] = React.useState<number | undefined>(
+    undefined,
+    s => s !== undefined && s >= 0 && s < items.length ? s : undefined
+  )
+  
+  // Other component code
+}
+```
+
+# Motivation
+
+It's currently possible to do this via a `setState` call within the render method. However, this is has some downsides.
+
+* Your logic must not call `setState` if the state does not change to avoid infinite loops - and the errors aren't always so straight forward to follow
+* It's easy to accidentally run the first render with invalid values - which may not be an issue if it's only used in `useEffect` - however, later code changes can cause crashes (i.e. when your state is an index to some other data structure)
+* You cause a second render pass
+
+Having a more ergonomic API for this somewhat common usecase will lead to fewer bugs.
+
+# Detailed design
+
+The second function is always evaluated at component render time, and is called with the current state.
+
+If it returned value is the same as the state passed in, it behaves as a normal current-day `useState` hook.
+
+If the returned value differs from the state passed in, the state is internally updated, and the tuple returned has the `0th` element set to the new value. No additional render pass is executed on the component.
+
+In development mode, whenever the function returns a new value, the function will be executed again with the new value passed in, and an error is thrown if the value changes an additional time.
+
+The eslint plugin can remain the same.
+
+# Drawbacks
+
+* Additional APIs
+* Makes `useState` and `useReducer` less unified (assuming we don't want to add this feature to `useReducer`)
+* This can be implemented in user-space, at the cost of the lint plugin being overly conservative about dependencies
+* Creates two approaches to update state at render time, rather than just the one we have today
+
+# Alternatives
+
+```js
+const useStateConstraint = <S>(
+  initialState: S | (() => S),
+  getDerivedState: (state: S) => S,
+): [S, Dispatch<SetStateAction<S>>] => {
+  const stateTuple = useState(initialState);
+  const prevState = stateTuple[0];
+  const nextState = getDerivedState(prevState);
+  if (!Object.is(prevState, nextState)) {
+    if (__DEV__) {
+      if (getDerivedState(nextState) !== nextState) {
+        throw new Error('Expected useStateConstraint to return stable value');
+      }
+    }
+
+    const setState = stateTuple[1];
+    setState(nextState);
+    return [nextState, setState];
+  } else {
+    return stateTuple;
+  }
+}
+```
+
+# Adoption strategy
+
+Not a breaking change.
+
+# How we teach this
+
+This is already taught in `getDerivedStateFromProps` - and there's [documentation for the current-day hooks equivalent](https://reactjs.org/docs/hooks-faq.html#how-do-i-implement-getderivedstatefromprops).
+
+# Unresolved questions
+
+Nil.