Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 9, 2020. It is now read-only.

Add ethminer to Portage #6

Open
candrews opened this issue Oct 27, 2017 · 8 comments
Open

Add ethminer to Portage #6

candrews opened this issue Oct 27, 2017 · 8 comments

Comments

@candrews
Copy link

I'm a Gentoo developer and I'm quite interested in getting ethminer into Portage.

Would you mind if I grabbed your ebuild and used it? And would you be interested in maintaining it with me (and therefore dropping it from this overlay)?

Thanks!

@reagentoo
Copy link
Owner

Hello! Yes, of course! You can add any ebuild from this overlay to the tree.

But it is worth considering that ethminer has a terrible build system and every release will require further development. And also, for the current release, I didn't test CUDA support. I would like to leave 9999 in the overlay. Do I need to drop both?

@candrews
Copy link
Author

I happen to be a big fan of -9999 ebuilds so I'd like to take that too.

Regarding CUDA, I only have an Intel CPU and an AMD GPU, so I can't test that either unfortunately.

@reagentoo
Copy link
Owner

May be 9999 ⟶ 9999-r1 ?

@candrews
Copy link
Author

This hunter mess is terribly annoying. I'm not really comfortable maintaining a package with so many seds.... I didn't realize the state of the ethminer project was so non-standard.

@reagentoo
Copy link
Owner

I suspected that this package does not belong in the tree. :)

@EoD
Copy link

EoD commented Jan 2, 2018

@candrews maybe you can contribute to the discussion at ethereum-mining/ethminer#219 .

@reagentoo
Copy link
Owner

@EoD I think the authors of the project do not intend to change this bastard approach of development. We need to drop this shit-Hunter completely. :)

@EoD
Copy link

EoD commented Jan 2, 2018

Well, if you don't ask, you will never know. I do think that they are willing to listen to a compromise if you have some idea.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants