Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

entity matching in addition to entity reconciliation? #2

Open
VladimirAlexiev opened this issue Jun 21, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

entity matching in addition to entity reconciliation? #2

VladimirAlexiev opened this issue Jun 21, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@VladimirAlexiev
Copy link

Reconciliation (as exemplified by OpenRefine) is "one to many": one tabular row is matched against many entities in a dataset or KG. (For efficiency, the protocol sends a batch of rows, but each one is treated separately.)

Entity matching (as a merging step needed in KG building) is "many to many": potentially ALL entities of the source dataset are considered, and entities in either the source or target dataset may be merged.

Is the scope of this group limited to Reconciliation only, or would it also include Matching?

@wetneb
Copy link
Member

wetneb commented Jun 21, 2019

I am not sure what a web-based protocol would look like for entity matching, it is an interesting question. I am not against discussing that problem in the group, given that it is clearly closely related.

@wetneb
Copy link
Member

wetneb commented Jun 28, 2019

I am adding this in the document as in scope for now, but it can be changed.

wetneb added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 28, 2019
@VladimirAlexiev
Copy link
Author

@wetneb
Copy link
Member

wetneb commented Jul 24, 2019

That is very useful Vladimir, I did not know about EDOAL! If you are familiar with it, do you want to write something about what you think about it in relation to the reconciliation API in https://github.com/reconciliation-api/census/blob/master/_pages/other-protocols.md?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants