Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Coherent GitHub topics #24

Open
wibeasley opened this issue Feb 22, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Coherent GitHub topics #24

wibeasley opened this issue Feb 22, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@wibeasley
Copy link
Member

wibeasley commented Feb 22, 2017

To any developers of REDCap API packages/code (including @tjrivera, @aarenson, @mullen2, @nutterb, @rparrish, @sburns, @pbchase, @eugyev, @peterclark, @haozhu233, @james2012, @agapow):

GitHub's new Topics should help make our libraries more findable. This makes me happy a maintainer of the REDCap Tools Projects page, because it should make it easier for someone to find a library/package that best suits their needs and environment.

I've recently asked the REDCap Development Committee to agree on a coherent scheme (eg, redcap, redcap-api, and redcap-plugin) so our repos' tags aren't so scattered. Of course these are just suggestions to help identify & distinguish the roles of our packages; I'm not pretending to have authority over anyone.

For now, I think you can apply redcap without worrying about conflicting with the upcoming scheme. I'll give the committee a week or two and report the results.

Edit: here's the link on the forums, if you have access: https://community.projectredcap.org/content/idea/15797/tagging-github-repos-with-topics.html

@wibeasley wibeasley self-assigned this Feb 22, 2017
@sburns
Copy link
Contributor

sburns commented Feb 23, 2017

👍 to 'redcap'

@agapow
Copy link

agapow commented Mar 2, 2017

Ditto

@wibeasley
Copy link
Member Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants