Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The maximum wait time for acquiring a resource from the Jedis Pool may exceed expectations. #4014

Open
gududesundapao opened this issue Nov 8, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
bug dependencies Pull request that updates a dependency

Comments

@gududesundapao
Copy link

Hello !

Expected behavior

If the number of connections currently being created has reached the maxTotal, subsequent threads waiting to create connections will wait for a maxWaitMillis time, as the connections currently being created might fail.

We expect the waiting time not to exceed maxWaitMillis time, as this parameter affects our estimation of the overall time taken by the interface.

Actual behavior

But in situations where the connection is tight, the waiting time can be up to twice the maxWaitMillis consumption.

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Reduce the maximum number of connections
  2. Using Linux TC mechanism to cause TCP communication timeout
  3. Observe the maximum waiting time

We have found that in some special cases, when creating connections from a connection pool, there may be excessively long waiting times

code:
redis.clients.jedis.JedisPool#getResource
-> redis.clients.jedis.util.Pool#getResource
-> org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.GenericObjectPool#borrowObject(long)
-> org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.GenericObjectPool#create

image

image

The thread that failed to create the connection will wake up the thread that is waiting to be created.
Threads that do not compete for resources will wait again, and the waiting time will still be the maxWaitMillis.
unbelievable!
If the first waiting time is ( maxWaitMillis - 1ms ), plus the second full waiting time, then the full waiting time will be twice the expected time.

The waiting time we hope for this time is the total waiting time minus the time already waited

We are not sure if this issue has been addressed and look forward to your reply

Redis / Jedis Configuration

redis-client.timeout=100
redis-client.pool.maxTotal=1
redis-client.pool.maxIdle=1
redis-client.pool.minIdle=1
redis-client.pool.testOnBorrow=false
redis-client.pool.testWhileIdle=true
redis-client.pool.timeBetweenEvictionRunsMillis=30000
redis-client.pool.minEvictableIdleTimeMillis=1800000
redis-client.pool.numTestsPerEvictionRun=3
redis-client.pool.softMinEvictableIdleTimeMillis=-1
redis-client.pool.blockWhenExhausted=true
redis-client.pool.maxWaitMillis=80

Jedis version:

3.6.3

apache commons-pool2 version:

2.9.0

Redis version:

Java version:

1.8

@sazzad16
Copy link
Collaborator

sazzad16 commented Nov 8, 2024

@gududesundapao First of all, thank you for using Jedis.

Jedis is dependent on Apache Commons Pool. This is also evident from the source code you have provided because those are from that library. You may try their user mailing list. You may even try their developer mailing list if you have some idea about solving the issue.

Thank for understanding.

@sazzad16 sazzad16 added the dependencies Pull request that updates a dependency label Nov 8, 2024
@garydgregory
Copy link

@gududesundapao
Copy link
Author

@sazzad16 hello
Commos pool has fixed this issue,Does Jedis have a repair plan?
Thanks again

@sazzad16
Copy link
Collaborator

@gududesundapao The fix is not released yet. If you really need it, you may consider building the commons-pool library from their source code.

@garydgregory Do you have any tentative date for commons-pool 2.12.1 ?

@sazzad16 sazzad16 added the bug label Nov 27, 2024
@garydgregory
Copy link

I have 2 other releases in Commons in progress. I'd like to clear the decks before I do another.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug dependencies Pull request that updates a dependency
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants