You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, thanks for your great package. Recently I have been developing pylibfreenect2 and I now think it's basically feature complete; it supports color, depth and IR transfers as well as registration functionality (which described in your TODOs). Also it's continuously tested with CI services on ubuntu and windows (on osx locally, tests are limited though).
As discussed in OpenKinect/libfreenect2#280, it would be great to avoid package duplication for the python binding. Can we merge our efforts into a single package? Do you have any thoughts on this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ATM I don't have enough time to maintain this package; if you can, your package can be the standard Python binding and I can mark mine undeveloped, etc.
Thanks for your reply. Probably I can maintain my package at least for a while, since I'm using it right now. I'm using a different approach from you (based on cython) though, I think I've done all of your TODOs described at README;
Implement Registration.apply (in py_Registration_apply)
Make the pipeline argument of Freenect2Device's constructor actually do something
Test everything
If you get a change to look into my code and If you feel there are any missing features, please leave a comment. I will try to implement. Thanks again!
Hi, thanks for your great package. Recently I have been developing pylibfreenect2 and I now think it's basically feature complete; it supports color, depth and IR transfers as well as registration functionality (which described in your TODOs). Also it's continuously tested with CI services on ubuntu and windows (on osx locally, tests are limited though).
As discussed in OpenKinect/libfreenect2#280, it would be great to avoid package duplication for the python binding. Can we merge our efforts into a single package? Do you have any thoughts on this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: