Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rule: Missing Initialization Steps #5

Open
marks-res opened this issue Dec 8, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Rule: Missing Initialization Steps #5

marks-res opened this issue Dec 8, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@marks-res
Copy link
Member

marks-res commented Dec 8, 2023

Feature Request

Rule Name Category Description
missing-initialization-steps Logical Error Many teams have a standard set of commands they want each method to begin with (e.g. re-initializing the instrument, confirming that the production branch of code rather than development is checked out when an Operator is running a method…). This rule automatically checks and enforces that those are included.
@marks-res marks-res added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant