Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move authentication to arbimon.org #1970

Open
antonyharfield opened this issue May 13, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Move authentication to arbimon.org #1970

antonyharfield opened this issue May 13, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@antonyharfield
Copy link
Member

antonyharfield commented May 13, 2024

Context: We would like to (and need to for browser security reasons) have users login to Arbimon through an arbimon.org domain (not rfcx.org as it currently is). To achieve this, we will need separate logins for Arbimon and Guardian platforms.

This will solve the browser security issues affecting Safari (and soon to be Chrome) as identified in #1676.

Scope:

  • Create a new Auth0 account for Guardian
  • Move Guardian users to the new Auth0 account
  • Switch current Auth0 account to use arbimon.org as its custom domain
  • Ensure all web, mobile and desktop users are not impacted by this change (i.e. we want to avoid users having to download a new app)
@antonyharfield
Copy link
Member Author

antonyharfield commented May 13, 2024

Molly raised a related point in an eng-support discussion that fully Arbimon branded signing experience would aid the conversion of new users from marketing emails.

Please remove the RFCx logo from the Arbimon login page and the Arbimon Sign Up page.

It isn't necessary to include and just confuses that sign in/log in user experience.

@antonyharfield antonyharfield changed the title Move authentication from arbimon.org Move authentication to arbimon.org May 13, 2024
@naluinui naluinui added this to the Auth on Arbimon milestone May 15, 2024
@koonchaya
Copy link

Should we remove the RFCx logo now?

@naluinui
Copy link
Contributor

@koonchaya I think so according to Ant's comment above #1970 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants