You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
after the trimming process, I find the single-junction-adapter present in quite a few sequences and I'm trying to figure out how the junction adapter detection process works.
In the example below, there's a perfetct match of the single-junction-adapter in the forward read and of its reverse complement in the reverse read. The reverse read however also contains the single-junction-adapter with one mismatch. I wonder why nextclip preferred to put the read pair into category B instead of trimming the perfect adapter matches from each read and putting the into category A. Is this just an unfortunate coincidence or justified behaviour?
Thank
chris
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That is an unfortunate coincidence and not something I've seen before. But it does make me realise I need to tighten up the algorithm to spot cases like this. I'll try and do it soon.
Hi,
after the trimming process, I find the single-junction-adapter present in quite a few sequences and I'm trying to figure out how the junction adapter detection process works.
In the example below, there's a perfetct match of the single-junction-adapter in the forward read and of its reverse complement in the reverse read. The reverse read however also contains the single-junction-adapter with one mismatch. I wonder why nextclip preferred to put the read pair into category B instead of trimming the perfect adapter matches from each read and putting the into category A. Is this just an unfortunate coincidence or justified behaviour?
Thank
chris
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: