Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Read cost for EVs and ICEs from Fraunhofer report #11

Open
martavp opened this issue May 7, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Read cost for EVs and ICEs from Fraunhofer report #11

martavp opened this issue May 7, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@martavp
Copy link
Collaborator

martavp commented May 7, 2023

fraunhofer_ISE_costs.csv

Fraunhofer ISE: Wege zu einem klimaneutralen Energiesystem (2020).

@martavp martavp changed the title Use cost assumptions from Fraunhofer report Read cost for EVs and ICEs from Fraunhofer report May 7, 2023
@BertoGBG
Copy link
Collaborator

BertoGBG commented May 8, 2023

do you refer to this table I the appendix?
Is it possible to get the reference for this? the vehicle prices are particularly low (lowest than any other technology).
image

I suggest to update not only the cost but to use similar concept for the efficiency. If we want to follow their approach of having an exogenous input for battery size and energy consumption (efficiency).

@martavp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

martavp commented May 9, 2023

Yes, I mean that table.
We should read the data from the csv file included in the first message (let's avoid human reading from a pdf.)
The csv can be downloaded from Fraunhofer
Ideally, we create a PR to include that data in the technology-data repository and output files

Then, we could use prepare_costs() to deal with the cost and technology assumptions for different cars in a clean way.
I mention here @lisazeyen (just so that she is aware) who has already used these costs in previous work and provided the csv file

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants