-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
vernacularNames in Opmerkingen, not matching GBIF_Code/Soort #51
Comments
Repeatable with: raw_data <- readr::read_csv(
here::here("data", "raw", "rato_data.csv")
filter(raw_data, Dossier_ID == 41583) |
In some records, there are dutch vernacular names in
in occurrenceID: This is mapped to a different turtle, based on the GBIF id. I believe they were trying to catch 2 individuals of species Do I understand this correctly? How would you handle this? Should this be fixed on the data side, should we make an exception just for this record in the mapping Do you think we should systematically check for vernacular and scientific names in |
Same table as above, but less columns:
|
The raw data reports species "Lettersierschildpad" with the correct gbif id, however in
Opmerkingen
there is mention of :12/06: sabotage, 07/07: Zaagrugschildpad ( groot exemplaar)
, which is Graptemys sp.This event has been in the dataset for a while, occurrences in current output:
In the raw data we can see only the last 3 records make mention of Graptemys sp.
There are probably more examples of vernacular names being mentioned in
Opmerkingen
, some of which might also not match theGBIF_Code
provided.For now, I will not make an exception and parse just these records to add a new species, but I'll create an issue to be discussed when everyone involved is back from holidays.
Originally posted by @PietrH in #50 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: