Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add an article to introduce preinstrumented jars #118

Open
utzcoz opened this issue Jun 18, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

Add an article to introduce preinstrumented jars #118

utzcoz opened this issue Jun 18, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@utzcoz
Copy link
Member

utzcoz commented Jun 18, 2022

From Robolectric 4.6, the preinstrumented jars are used by Robolectric default. But the article/post to introduce this big improvement is missing. It's better if we can append this content to our blog, and introduce the internal of preinstrumented jars and its improvement for Robolectric.

@utzcoz
Copy link
Member Author

utzcoz commented Oct 14, 2022

Hi @hoisie , do you have time to write an article for this topic? I think it can show performance boost of Robolectric after preinstrumented jars introduced.

@MGaetan89
Copy link
Member

@utzcoz does #305 (or the existing ARCHITECTURE.md) resolve this issue?

@utzcoz
Copy link
Member Author

utzcoz commented Sep 10, 2024

@MGaetan89 Yeah. If the architecture page is merged, I think this issue can be closed.

@utzcoz
Copy link
Member Author

utzcoz commented Sep 10, 2024

Actually I still hope we can have a summary article for recent years' optimization for performance, and many developers can know them from the article. But the architecture documentation is good enough to me now.

@MGaetan89
Copy link
Member

MGaetan89 commented Sep 10, 2024

Actually I still hope we can have a summary article for recent years' optimization for performance, and many developers can know them from the article. But the architecture documentation is good enough to me now.

Let's keep this open then. For now, the new architecture page will serve as a base, but we can iterate over it later to provide more details and insights.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants