Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discussion about the git stacked diffs / git stacks workflow #18

Open
rocketraman opened this issue Dec 22, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Discussion about the git stacked diffs / git stacks workflow #18

rocketraman opened this issue Dec 22, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@rocketraman
Copy link
Owner

rocketraman commented Dec 22, 2021

A post about stacked diffs:

This is a very interesting approach that works quite well, and with a slight tweak (stacked branches vs stacked diffs), is not mutually exlusive with gitworkflow.

Stacked branches essentially takes all the pain out of managing topic branch dependencies -- in gitworkflow these are handled via recording topic dependencies i.e. topic B depends on topic A, by merging A into B, and then continuing to work on B. In stacked branches, B is simply "stacked" on top of A, and the tooling manages the stack i.e. if A changes, B is automatically rebased.

Stacked diffs / branches is more about developing code and doing code reviews and managing a developer's stack of work, while gitworkflow is more about CI and deploying code, so I believe these tools and techniques are complementary.

I've been playing around with https://graphite.dev/ and its really very nice. See this introductory video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cE59cfwWL7M.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant