spelling of "exponentiate"

[bob-carpenter]

It's "exponentiate" in the GUI, but should be "exponentiate".

Also, I also think it'd probably help to call out that the default is on the log scale, perhaps by putting a label on the y axis either generically as log p(y), or specifically, like "log logistic(y | 2.3, 8.9)".

P.S. I love the way the flow of the way the graphics respond in the app---it makes it very pleasant to manipulate.

[rok-cesnovar]

It's "exponentiate" in the GUI, but should be "exponentiate".

Not sure if I missed something, but these two are the same?

Also, I also think it'd probably help to call out that the default is on the log scale, perhaps by putting a label on the y axis either generically as log p(y), or specifically, like "log logistic(y | 2.3, 8.9)".

Yeah, the l in the _lpdf suffix is probably not that evident and should be more pronounced. Thanks!

[bob-carpenter]

Not sure if I missed something, but these two are the same?

I'm blaming the spell checker, which changed "exponantiate" back to "exponentiate".