Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing archived packages #79

Open
steffilazerte opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Missing archived packages #79

steffilazerte opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@steffilazerte
Copy link

[Moved from https://github.com/ropensci/roregistry/issues/46]

I've been trying to track down some discrepancies in how we calculate the number of reviewed packages in the Annual Reporting.

One thing is that there are some packages that used to be listed in the registry/packages jsons which are no longer included.
There is a "type" field in the registry (active, experimental, archived), so shouldn't we always list packages, even those archived, unless the owner requests removal?

The following have been archived, but are not listed in the registry as archived:

  • Rclean
  • bittrex
  • bomrang
  • citesdb
  • cleanEHR
  • dbhydroR
  • getlandsat
  • gtfsr
  • infx
  • monkeylearn
  • mregions
  • nbaR
  • outsider
  • refimpact
  • ropenaq
  • rromeo
  • rtimicropem
  • tidytags
  • tabulizer

The roregistry README suggests that only packages in the ropensci repo are included, so this probably explains why those in ropensci-archive are excluded. Is this by design? Would it be possible to get all packages listed in the registry?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant